- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The CFO of Google has the sads because “we” lost
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:37 am to Bard
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:37 am to Bard
quote:
quote:
Were you actively using your platform to give free advertising
If so that's a biiiiiiiig no-no. Advertisers have to treat all office-seekers the same when it comes to price
Ahem.
LINK
quote:
In the emails, a Google executive describes efforts to pay for free rides for a certain sect of the population to the polls–a get-out-the-vote for Hispanic voters operation–and how these efforts were because she thought it would help Hillary Clinton win the general election in 2016. She also used the term “silent donation” to describe Google’s contribution to the effort to elect Clinton president.
1
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:50 am to AUin02
quote:
a Google executive describes efforts to pay for free rides for a certain sect of the population to the polls–a get-out-the-vote for Hispanic voters operation–and how these efforts were because she thought it would help Hillary Clinton win the general election in 2016. She also used the term “silent donation” to describe Google’s contribution to the effort to elect Clinton president.
I'm not sure if there are laws that apply to giving voters a ride to the polls if it's part of an active political bias.
What I do know though is this doesn't fall under advertising laws.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News