- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another example of “diversity and inclusion” equaling discrimination against white men
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:48 am to PEPE
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:48 am to PEPE
quote:
"diversity" ALWAYS means: fewer whites, fewer men, fewer Christians.
ALWAYS.
That is because of math. Right now white male Christian are a majority. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity means the percentage of people of color must go up. If their percentage of the national population goes up, by default whites's population percentage goes down. So yes increasing racial and ethnic diversity means Christian, white, men's percentage will shrink. It's math.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 3:49 am to ewdij
quote:
That is because of math. Right now white male Christian are a majority. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity means the percentage of people of color must go up. If their percentage of the national population goes up, by default whites's population percentage goes down. So yes increasing racial and ethnic diversity means Christian, white, men's percentage will shrink. It's math.
On what planet is the bolded true? White men make up about 34% of the United States population and about 7% of the entire world.
I never hear anyone complaining about the "diversity" problem in the NBA.
I never hear anyone complaining there are too many Asian people in Japan or too many Middle Eastern people in Egypt.
My point stands. Only areas deemed "too white" or "too male" is diversity an issue. Any other makeup of races or genders, no matter how lopsided, is apparently fine.
This post was edited on 7/20/18 at 3:51 am
Posted on 7/20/18 at 5:03 am to ewdij
quote:
That is because of math. Right now white male Christian are a majority. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity means the percentage of people of color must go up. If their percentage of the national population goes up, by default whites's population percentage goes down. So yes increasing racial and ethnic diversity means Christian, white, men's percentage will shrink. It's math.
In the context of specific workplaces or even specific careers this is, of course, false.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 7:08 am to ewdij
quote:
That is because of math. Right now white male Christian are a majority.
1. You seem like a queer. You may not be a queer, but you seem that way.
2. "Diversity" isn't solely oriented around the issue of skin color. For instance, whites are FAR MORE diverse in real terms than blacks or Asians or mexicans. So we know you aren't interested in diversity (actual). You are interested in the marxist concept of social justice. Strong, white, Christian, men must represent the oppressive ruling class, while your pet minorities represent the downtrodden lower class in need of your heroics.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 7:42 am to ewdij
quote:
That is because of math. Right now white male Christian are a majority. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity means the percentage of people of color must go up. If their percentage of the national population goes up, by default whites's population percentage goes down. So yes increasing racial and ethnic diversity means Christian, white, men's percentage will shrink. It's math.
True diversity is diversity of ideas and experiences. Only racists care about racial diversity.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 8:16 am to ewdij
Simple math., and it doesn’t necessarily follow that white males are being screwed out of anything
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News