- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did the LSU-Alabama Rematch Really Kill the BCS?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 4:31 pm to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 7/11/18 at 4:31 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:now I agree with an objective system would be best, but that's impossible with 130 teams in 10 conferences, plus a few independents.
I would prefer an objective standard like winning your conference to be the qualifier with just 4 teams. If they took just the top 4 conference winners (no auto bid for a specific conference) it would be objective
So I'd like the playoff expanded to 8 teams. Power 5 champs get auto bids, plus 3 at large. That way, the committee is only deciding 3 bids to non-conference winners and we use objective criteria (conference champs) for 5 of the 8 bids.
1
Posted on 7/11/18 at 4:39 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
So I'd like the playoff expanded to 8 teams. Power 5 champs get auto bids, plus 3 at large. That way, the committee is only deciding 3 bids to non-conference winners and we use objective criteria (conference champs) for 5 of the 8 bids.
I still don’t see why you object so much to the committee? What did they get so horribly wrong? I personally would quibble with Bama last year and Ohio St in 2016 but both would easily be in an 8 teamer. I also don’t like auto bids for certain conferences plus with that scenario assuming we’d still have CCGs you could easily have situations where a team would better off not playing in the CCG.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News