- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Big Ten’s revenue distributions will top $52 million per school next year
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:39 am to KosmoCramer
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:39 am to KosmoCramer
B/c the cable bubble will eventually pop and the streaming services are not going to be paying the same kind of cheese at that point. They won't need to.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 1:34 pm to Dr RC
Streaming services could be a factor that keeps the bubble expanding. Netflix & Amazon have billions available to invest, and the rights to sporting events is an opportunity to expand their offerings, while striking a big blow to traditional TV.
The old model of adding Maryland or Rutgers to a conference primarily because they are in heavily populated areas is quickly becoming outdated. That bubble will burst soon.
That model relied heavily on subscriber fees to generate revenue. Those fees are determined by a universities footprint. Both Maryland and Rutgers have a footprint across multiple states in heavily populated areas, so the Big Ten network charges higher rates to cable/satellite companies in those areas.
However, cord cutting has put the emphasis on viewership and quality. Rutgers isn’t attracting viewers, but they do generate revenue through backdoor fees.
The old model of adding Maryland or Rutgers to a conference primarily because they are in heavily populated areas is quickly becoming outdated. That bubble will burst soon.
That model relied heavily on subscriber fees to generate revenue. Those fees are determined by a universities footprint. Both Maryland and Rutgers have a footprint across multiple states in heavily populated areas, so the Big Ten network charges higher rates to cable/satellite companies in those areas.
However, cord cutting has put the emphasis on viewership and quality. Rutgers isn’t attracting viewers, but they do generate revenue through backdoor fees.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 3:48 pm to Dr RC
quote:
streaming services are not going to be paying the same kind of cheese at that point. They won't need to.
Why not?You don't think they'll bid against each other
just like the networks?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)