Started By
Message

re: The Big Ten’s revenue distributions will top $52 million per school next year

Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:39 am to
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58184 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 10:39 am to
B/c the cable bubble will eventually pop and the streaming services are not going to be paying the same kind of cheese at that point. They won't need to.
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11489 posts
Posted on 6/22/18 at 1:34 pm to
Streaming services could be a factor that keeps the bubble expanding. Netflix & Amazon have billions available to invest, and the rights to sporting events is an opportunity to expand their offerings, while striking a big blow to traditional TV.

The old model of adding Maryland or Rutgers to a conference primarily because they are in heavily populated areas is quickly becoming outdated. That bubble will burst soon.

That model relied heavily on subscriber fees to generate revenue. Those fees are determined by a universities footprint. Both Maryland and Rutgers have a footprint across multiple states in heavily populated areas, so the Big Ten network charges higher rates to cable/satellite companies in those areas.

However, cord cutting has put the emphasis on viewership and quality. Rutgers isn’t attracting viewers, but they do generate revenue through backdoor fees.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27323 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

streaming services are not going to be paying the same kind of cheese at that point. They won't need to.




Why not?You don't think they'll bid against each other
just like the networks?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram