- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TX water company says brown water is "good water"
Posted on 6/15/18 at 2:49 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 6/15/18 at 2:49 pm to Draconian Sanctions
The mainstream libertarian position isn’t that there wouldn’t be regulatory bodies that offer insight/oversight. It’s that those bodies would be private instead of governmental. Think state Bar associations.
Just off the cuff, I could conceive of competing organizations that, for a fee, would review the plans of any construction project if requested. I could further see a subscription model that would allow you to check anything they had on file. Moving into a new apartment building? Check to see if the plans were ever reviewed. If not, let them know that you aren’t interested unless it gets the stamp of approval. We already all do this when we ask for the CarFacts report when we buy a car. You’ll notice it’s the rare person that brings a magnet to a car dealership these days to check for body work repairs.
Just off the cuff, I could conceive of competing organizations that, for a fee, would review the plans of any construction project if requested. I could further see a subscription model that would allow you to check anything they had on file. Moving into a new apartment building? Check to see if the plans were ever reviewed. If not, let them know that you aren’t interested unless it gets the stamp of approval. We already all do this when we ask for the CarFacts report when we buy a car. You’ll notice it’s the rare person that brings a magnet to a car dealership these days to check for body work repairs.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 3:01 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
It’s that those bodies would be private instead of governmental.
Sounds wonderful on paper.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 3:06 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
The mainstream libertarian position isn’t that there wouldn’t be regulatory bodies that offer insight/oversight. It’s that those bodies would be private instead of governmental. Think state Bar associations
And would be built to make money. Not to protect consumers.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 3:21 pm to Joshjrn
The problem with that though is generally those private oversight bodies don’t have the same ability to protect the public/consumers without controlling licensure nor the motive as they would presumably be for profit enterprises.
There are certainly some areas where privatization of the administration of certain things is fine and would be more efficient, I don’t have a problem with that generally, but again when you get in the weeds on these things you find out the regulations tend to exist for a reason. Are some outdated and others overburdensom? Absolutely, not arguing that & I’m all for regular review. I don’t have a problem with the repeal 2 regs for ever new one you want to imlement (for a time at least) either for he record.
There are certainly some areas where privatization of the administration of certain things is fine and would be more efficient, I don’t have a problem with that generally, but again when you get in the weeds on these things you find out the regulations tend to exist for a reason. Are some outdated and others overburdensom? Absolutely, not arguing that & I’m all for regular review. I don’t have a problem with the repeal 2 regs for ever new one you want to imlement (for a time at least) either for he record.
This post was edited on 6/15/18 at 3:23 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News