- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sports Illustrated Article About Fulton
Posted on 6/13/18 at 2:38 pm to tigerfoot
Posted on 6/13/18 at 2:38 pm to tigerfoot
the punishment for tampering shouldn't be worse than an actual failed drug test. That's just absurd and defies logic. That would be like an innocent person serving a harsher punishment for a murder they didn't commit because they tampered with evidence.
2
Posted on 6/13/18 at 2:50 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
the punishment for tampering shouldn't be worse than an actual failed drug test. That's just absurd and defies logic
it's in place to force the athlete to provide a true sample. It makes perfect sense.
similar to refusing sobriety tests in LA results in an automatic suspension for a year. As opposed to 90 days if you blow illegally.
Posted on 6/13/18 at 11:19 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
the punishment for tampering shouldn't be worse than an actual failed drug test. That's just absurd and defies logic.
huh?
The punishment should absolutely be worse. You want to disincentivise tampering. What would the downside be to tampering if you are going to test dirty if the punishment was the same?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News