- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Failing AND Corrupt NYTs called out again...
Posted on 5/27/18 at 6:23 am to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 5/27/18 at 6:23 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:This Pottinger guy gave a rambling and somewhat disjointed answer to the question from the reporter, so the reporter cleaned it up to make it readable. The substance was essentially the same, though I would have used “difficult” rather than “impossible.”
the nyt is fake news. And given there is no source saying what the nyt claims was said, the attributed source actually does not exist.
Paraphrasing a source is not “fake news.”
This post was edited on 5/27/18 at 6:30 am
Posted on 5/27/18 at 6:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Paraphrasing a source is not “fake news.
Drawing ridiculous unsupported conclusions from a statement is definitely fake news.
And remember, when they all lied about the "animals" comment, Maggie Haberman of this very same gossip rag made it very clear it's not their job to provide context.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 6:34 am to AggieHank86
So it's your position that the NYT doesn't lie and spread divisive bullshite about the President. They've been lying to the American people all along. So it doesn't matter if the story is true or not their credibility is less than zero. The NYT and other news outlets have nobody to blame but themselves. My question to the leftists here is how can you get so bent out of shape over this when you've done nothing but stand and clap every other time the MSM has posted straight lies attacking the man and his family. The truth is I simply don't care what the times reports because they've lost the trust of the people.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 6:41 am to AggieHank86
quote:No it wasn't.
The substance was essentially the same
It wasn't close.
Paraphrasing implies some accuracy.
To believe the fake report was remotely accurate, one would have to believe that planning which had been ongoing for weeks for a meeting scheduled weeks away would be rendered "impossible" by a few days hiatus. In other words, one would need be an imbecile or a liar or both.
Posted on 5/27/18 at 6:43 am to AggieHank86
quote:
would have used “difficult” rather than “impossible
Do you understand the difference between these two words?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)