Started By
Message

re: Would you rather have gone “over the top” in WWI or been on the first wave on D-Day?

Posted on 5/23/18 at 3:41 pm to
Posted by WavinWilly
Wavin Away in Sharlo
Member since Oct 2010
8783 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 3:41 pm to
If I recall correctly, my grandfather told me my great-grandfather was one of only 30-something original members of his square division to survive. So anything but WWI.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29409 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 3:44 pm to
U.S. casualty figures for WWI

quote:

For the combined Army, Navy and Marine forces of 4.7 million (Army of 4.1 million and a Navy of 600,000), the U.S. Department of Defense official figures for the period from 1 April 1917 to 31 December 1918 stand at 116,516 deaths.[3] This includes 479 soldiers and 675 members of the Navy and the Marine Corps lost at sea.[4] The U.S. Coast Guard lost an additional 192 men.[5] Fully two-thirds of all American deaths occurred in the last three months of the war - September, October, and November 1918 - due to the influenza pandemic of 1918 and the AEF's greatest battle, the Meuse-Argonne (26 September 1918 – 11 November 1918). The United States was also unique in that - due largely to the epidemic - almost half of the losses occurred in training camps in the homeland rather than on the battlefields of Europe. The United States consequently lost more soldiers and sailors to disease than in combat, with 53,402 battle deaths and 63,114 non-combat deaths.[6]

LINK

More died from non-combat deaths than combat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram