Started By
Message

re: SIAP: Duffer Brothers sued for stealing “Stranger Things” idea from short film

Posted on 4/4/18 at 7:22 pm to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51915 posts
Posted on 4/4/18 at 7:22 pm to
Big difference however from thematic similarities and it being documented that the idea was pitched, declined, but early documents containing explicit references to the declined material.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 4/4/18 at 10:23 pm to
Paramount had the show bible and 20 or so written episodes in various states of completion years before Babylon 5 was finally picked up and then DS9 went in production using the B5 bible.


Once Upon a Time happened after Fables was shopped around for a TV show.

A quick wiki summary of the Dan Brown stuff,

quote:

Copyright infringement cases
In August 2005 author Lewis Perdue unsuccessfully sued Brown for plagiarism, on the basis of claimed similarity between The Da Vinci Code and his novels, The Da Vinci Legacy (1983) and Daughter of God (2000). Judge George Daniels said, in part: "A reasonable average lay observer would not conclude that The Da Vinci Code is substantially similar to Daughter of God."[32]

In April 2006 Brown's publisher, Random House, won a copyright infringement case brought by authors Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, who claimed that Brown stole ideas from their 1982 book Holy Blood Holy Grail for his 2003 novel The Da Vinci Code. It was in the book Holy Blood Holy Grail that Baigent, Leigh, and co-author Henry Lincoln had advanced the theory that Jesus and Mary Magdalene married and had a child and that the bloodline continues to this day. Brown apparently alluded to the two authors' names in his book. Leigh Teabing, a lead character in both the novel and the film, uses Leigh's name as the first name, and anagrammatically derives his last name from Baigent's. Mr Justice Peter Smith found in Brown's favor in the case, and as a private amusement, embedded his own Smithy code in the written judgment.[33]

On March 28, 2007, Brown's publisher, Random House, won an appeal copyright infringement case. The Court of Appeal of England and Wales rejected the efforts from Baigent and Leigh, who became liable for paying legal expenses of nearly US$6 million.[34]

Brown has been sued twice in U.S. Federal courts by the author Jack Dunn who claims Brown copied a huge part of his book The Vatican Boys to write The Da Vinci Code (2006–07) and Angels & Demons (2011-12). Both lawsuits were not allowed to go to a jury trial. In 2017, in London, another claim was begun against Brown by Jack Dunn who claimed that Justice was not served in the U.S. lawsuits


Dan Brown is a good comparison here because the guy is trying to claim Jesus-Mary Magdaline and the bloodline as his invention. When it's been in public play for longer than his books have been out.

Montauk is the same way as the above and Groom Lake/Area 51 it's a cultural icon, you can't just claim the concepts as your own invention. It's a public mythos.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram