- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Latest, greatest minority. Zoophiles!
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:10 am
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:10 am
CNSNEWS
quote:
The recently crowned Best Picture is about a woman getting freaky with a fish-man hybrid thing. And the fantasy seems to have created a stir among a certain segment of the alt-left. Since the markets abhor a vacuum, Shape of Water-inspired dildos are earning rave reviews at places like Slate. But the Huffington Post’s Ashley Feinberg has no time for mere baubles of unfulfilled aquatic fantasy. She found a fish fornication expert to review “The Shape of Water." Malcolm J. Brenner sleeps with the fishes. Or, he did, back in the 1970s. And it was an aquatic mammal, not a fish. But the fact is, according to Feinberg, Brenner “fell in love with and ultimately made love to a dolphin named Dolly.” On porpoise! (Sorry.) Brenner later wrote a book about the fling, and was the subject of a documentary (trailor below). He calls himself a “zoophile,” but he’s no love ‘em and leave ‘em playboy. Feinberg tells us Brenner “draws a careful distinction between zoophiles and mere bestialists … the latter “might just have sex with an animal and walk away,” while the former “is someone who has tender or caring emotions for their animal partner.” You know where this is going, right? Feinberg notes that “‘The Shape of Water’ ... frames its interspecies romance in social-justice terms.” Yep. Brenner and other zoophiles are a repressed minority, misunderstood by hidebound traditionalist society. Brenner says he’s had bigots “threatening to go Lorena Bobbitt on me because I made love with a Feedback “I’m hoping that in a more enlightened future,” he tells Feinberg, “zoophilia will be no more regarded as controversial or harmful than interracial sex is today.” Love wins!
quote:
I would like to think that society will become less religious, because the prohibitions in Leviticus are the only conceivable basis for any laws against bestiality. I can’t see that my boffing my dog has any effect on society, good or ill, as long as I’m not hurting her or abusing her. Laws against animal cruelty ought to be sufficient without criminalizing the act of interspecies sex, which organizations like PETA are trying to do.”
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 6:37 am
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:16 am to Revelator
Ya know. I oppose bestiality laws on pure liberty grounds but that said, I am not exactly willing to go to political war for these freaks
And i damned sure am never going to frame them as being oppressed or their critics as bigots for rightly calling them freaks.
Sorry dude. You fricked a dolphin. I may not want you in jail, but you are still a fricking weirdo i want nowhere near me.
And i damned sure am never going to frame them as being oppressed or their critics as bigots for rightly calling them freaks.
Sorry dude. You fricked a dolphin. I may not want you in jail, but you are still a fricking weirdo i want nowhere near me.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:20 am to ShortyRob
quote:
. I oppose bestiality laws on pure liberty grounds
That's a broad definition of Liberty!
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:30 am to Revelator
quote:
Since the markets abhor a vacuum, Shape of Water-inspired dildos are earning rave reviews at places like Slate. Since the markets abhor a vacuum, Shape of Water-inspired dildos are earning rave reviews at places like Slate.
So good they had to say it twice?
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:33 am to Revelator
quote:
That's a broad definition of Liberty
I know.
I have a very broad definition of the word. I think it's the only feasible definition
But frick these freaks if they think they're going to avoid social consequences
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:34 am to Revelator
This whole mess started when we gave women and blacks the vote.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:34 am to Revelator
hahahahahaha
I knew it
I am telling you, in 10,15,20 years they will push for legal fricking of little kids.
I knew it
I am telling you, in 10,15,20 years they will push for legal fricking of little kids.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:38 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Ya know. I oppose bestiality laws on pure liberty grounds
Can animals give consent? It's kind of rape by definition.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:41 am to gthog61
quote:
I am telling you, in 10,15,20 years they will push for legal fricking of little kids.
I think the idea of nothing being taboo is closer to reality every day.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:58 am to Revelator
In western law, the prohibitions against homosexuality, incest, and bestiality all originate in the same place. You cannot toss one without undermining them all.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:00 am to Revelator
So no shame in Hollywood then???? No way!
They continue to creep out everyone but themselves
They continue to creep out everyone but themselves
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:04 am to Revelator
They're a majority in Tuscaloosa.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:09 am to Boatshoes
quote:
, the prohibitions against homosexuality, incest, and bestiality all originate in the same place. You cannot toss one without undermining them all.
silliness:
Homosex - two CONSENTING people. For marriage - ADULTS
Incest - fear of genetic abnormalities (whether some or all are factual..I'll leave to science)
Bestiality - Cannot have "consent" from an animal
I'm not taking a position in this response. I am simply saying it is quite easy to "accept" homosex and "reject" the others
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 7:10 am
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:19 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Incest - fear of genetic abnormalities (whether some or all are factual..I'll leave to science)
Bestiality - Cannot have "consent" from an animal
What's silly is your low information counter argument. What is your opposition to incest if the parties involved agree not to have children? As far as consent, it is very easy to say that for an animal the act constitutes consent, or that consent is only relevant when Homo sapiens is involved.
Again, the restrictions against these deviant behaviors all originate in the same place,mans you cannot overturn the authority of one without overturning them all.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:20 am to shinerfan
quote:
Can animals give consent? It's kind of rape by definition
Look. I'm not defending the scum that's into this shite. But language has meaning and if you are going to use the word rape here then you have to use the word slavery for pets cattle horses Etc.
You can speak about these people with plenty of disdain without bastardizing the language
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:21 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I'm not taking a position in this response. I am simply saying it is quite easy to "accept" homosex and "reject" the others
Truth
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:21 am to Revelator
quote:
a certain segment of the alt-left.
bullshite! Everyone on the Left is alt-Left.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:22 am to ShortyRob
quote:
you are going to use the word rape here then you have to use the word slavery for pets cattle horse
PETA and their philosophical counterparts already do.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:24 am to Boatshoes
quote:
What is your opposition to incest if the parties involved agree not to have children?
ugh....
1) I said it was not MY position. Only, easily made
2) We do not make exceptions to general laws based upon a "promise" by others to not do a thing.
quote:
or that consent is only relevant when Homo sapiens is involved.
Exactly. No homo SAPIENS...no consent
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:25 am to Boatshoes
quote:
Again, the restrictions against these deviant behaviors all originate in the same place,mans you cannot overturn the authority of one without overturning them all.
But the law already makes a distinction. Right or wrongly, it does.
Are you saying that beastiality could be challenged in court and the law changed on the basis that homosexuality is currently legal?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News