re: Conflict of Interest?

quote:

---

I agree, also a matter of violating the Hatch Act in campaigning with her.

---

This is probably the most likely violation that was committed, but I doubt it would have been serious enough to warrant any major penalties.

But the $467,000 donation from Terry McAuliffe just seems like some red meat for people. I mean there was nothing illegal, or even that noteworthy, about the super pac of a state's governor donating to his party's candidate in his state's election.

And while people are trying to say McAuliffe's relationship with the Clintons is evidence that was basically used as a bribe for McCabe influence Hillary's investigation, there are quite of few major pieces of evidence that would have to be discovered to make that case.

And it's been year and half since then, and yet there is no more evidence to support this claim. And in fact, since McCabe's unauthorized leaking was information critical of Clinton, that evidence is counter to the bribe claim. I mean why would he take a bribe, a far more serious offense, only to turn around and cost his career and pension by going against the person who bribed him? That doesn't make sense.