- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oprah's ultra-PC ‘Wrinkle in Time’ stung with bad reviews as ‘cringeworthy’
Posted on 3/8/18 at 12:02 pm to P-Dawg
Posted on 3/8/18 at 12:02 pm to P-Dawg
quote:This is false. The reviewer provides the fresh or rotten rating, and in the few instances that one doesn’t, then they assign one after multiple people review the review.
Rotten tomatoes, as far as individual reviews, rates anything that scores a 50% (or just "not terrible" for ratings that don't give an alphanumeric rating) or higher as "fresh." So as long as it's a 50% rating, it's a positive.
1
Posted on 3/8/18 at 12:11 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
This is false. The reviewer provides the fresh or rotten rating, and in the few instances that one doesn’t, then they assign one after multiple people review the review.
I read that in an old article from the AV Club website, so either they just made that up or didn't do their research. Either way, I'm not sure that's better if a reviewer can give a 4/10 review but still mark it up as fresh, or vice-versa.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News