- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pro 2nd Amendment guys - would you take this deal?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:59 am to ShortyRob
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:59 am to ShortyRob
quote:
BUT...........if you SUBSIDIZE the negative results, then you will get EVEN MORE of it.
In most cases yes
In this case there is no evidence to suggest that
People already have a personal incentive not to do drugs
Providing subsidized rehab isn't an incentive to do drugs when not doing drugs is still the more logical alternative
1
Posted on 3/1/18 at 11:08 am to Powerman
quote:
In most cases yes
In all cases.
Pass a law tomorrow saying the Federal govt will give anyone who sells rattlesnakes to children under the age of 12 $100 and I'll show you a nation that has a few assholes selling rattlesnakes to children under 12.
quote:Well, I mean. That's just not true. Economics works........always.
In this case there is no evidence to suggest that
quote:To be sure. But, it's not the only incentive.
People already have a personal incentive not to do drugs
quote:
Providing subsidized rehab isn't an incentive to do drugs when not doing drugs is still the more logical alternative
If logical alternatives were the only thing driving abuse, you wouldn't have any in the first place.
I'm kinda stunned you aren't seeing this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News