- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In hindsight; was removing Saddam Hussein a good idea?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:43 am to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:43 am to Eli Goldfinger
Removing Hussein hurt the U.S. and the Republican party more than anything that has happened since Nixon.
Bush could have been a great President if not for it - now he is thought of as one of the worst, for good reason.
Bush could have been a great President if not for it - now he is thought of as one of the worst, for good reason.
1
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:52 am to Bham4Tide
No, but neither was removing Qadafi, or Mubarak, all were secular leaders that were put in place by the CIA long ago to stop the spread of Radical Islamist in the region.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News