- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: video: sjws shut down biology conference after physcial differences b/w sexes brought up
Posted on 2/26/18 at 7:28 am to Spock's Eyebrow
Posted on 2/26/18 at 7:28 am to Spock's Eyebrow
I love how you consider all those people "controversial," pretty sure there was a thread yesterday about this concept. God I didn't realize how effective propaganda was until these blue hairs came into existence
Posted on 2/26/18 at 7:31 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
I'm fine with ridiculing the green hairs, but why do you have to package it in such a deceptive way?
because the OP is one of the most dishonest posters on the PT
Posted on 2/26/18 at 7:43 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.theclackamasprint.net/wp-content/uploads/IMG_8186.jpg?resize=300%2C200)
Heather Clark
Clark, who goes by Heather Wombat on Facebook
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 7:46 am
Posted on 2/26/18 at 7:44 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
So accepting the fact there are biological differences between men and women has no place in a civilized society but breaking sound speakers while protesting is?
This is the liberal agenda at work. When facts prove you wrong, walk out and take away their speech. These people will be the same ones bitching about not finding a job after college and protesting for a socialist society because they can't make it on their own. Our only hope as a country is that they grow up and mature.
This is the liberal agenda at work. When facts prove you wrong, walk out and take away their speech. These people will be the same ones bitching about not finding a job after college and protesting for a socialist society because they can't make it on their own. Our only hope as a country is that they grow up and mature.
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 7:45 am
Posted on 2/26/18 at 8:53 am to Big_Slim
quote:
I love how you consider all those people "controversial,
That's not my word, moron, it's the event organizer's word, like I said.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:10 am to Spock's Eyebrow
Chill out Billy Badass, I'm just pointing out how laughable it is that the bar for controversy is now a biology teacher who says boys and girls are different. Bret Weinstein is the most relaxed guy ever and has done a shite ton more hands on for minorities than all the sky screamers afraid of his thoughts
Granted I misread your post but the event organizers did not say they designed it to be controversial as you implied
Granted I misread your post but the event organizers did not say they designed it to be controversial as you implied
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 9:12 am
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:13 am to Big_Slim
quote:
I'm just pointing out how laughable it is that the bar for controversy is now a biology teacher who says boys and girls are different
If that was the totality of the talk then you might have a point.
The talk was more about the pros and cons of diversity.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:14 am to Salmon
quote:
If that was the totality of the talk then you might have a point.
quote:
The talk was more about the pros and cons of diversity.
And so if we don't like the way the talk goes, it's okay to disrupt and sabotage sound equipment?
Good to know.
(ETA: There ARE cons to diversity. Come at me, bro.)
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 9:16 am
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:15 am to Salmon
Those look like real winners and what i picture some posters on here look like
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:16 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
And so if we don't like the way the talk goes, it's okay to disrupt and sabotage sound equipment?
in no way did I imply this
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:18 am to Salmon
quote:
in no way did I imply this
Is it controversial to suggest that there are cons to diversity?
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:20 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Is it controversial to suggest that there are cons to diversity?
by definition, yes
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:21 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
But these same people will tell you emphatically that the science is settled on climate change ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:23 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Maybe they can sue the human genomes for having different habits in men and women
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:24 am to Salmon
quote:
by definition, yes
Good. Is it controversial to offer 2 or more differing opinions on any topic?
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:25 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Is it controversial to offer 2 or more differing opinions on any topic?
Can we just skip the bullshite and get to your point?
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:28 am to Salmon
quote:
Can we just skip the bullshite and get to your point?
Does controversy justify these students (or anybody's) juvenile antics to try to silence the speakers? I get that they don't want to hear the talk. But, they don't want ANYONE to hear the talk, which is the essence of the progressive anti-speech movement that seems nearly universal on university campuses.
Do you:
1. Agree this is their goal, and
2. Agree with me that this is unsupportable and wrong.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:31 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Does controversy justify these students (or anybody's) juvenile antics to try to silence the speakers?
No. I never implied this either.
quote:
Do you:
1. Agree this is their goal,
Yes.
quote:
2. Agree with me that this is unsupportable and wrong.
Yes.
My only point in this thread is that I don't understand the need to reduce or mislead an already retarded event. The OP has a history of doing this because he is a dishonest hack.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:32 am to Salmon
quote:
I don't understand the need to reduce or mislead an already retarded event.
Fair enough. I don't think we have any significant disagreement on the topic, then.
(ETA: But, to be fair to the OP, this is when they appeared to strike - at the very mention of the factually supportable differences between men and women.)
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 9:33 am
Posted on 2/26/18 at 9:33 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
. I don't think we have any significant disagreement on the topic, then.
I doubt we have any
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)