- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russian Interference in the election?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:30 pm to NIH
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:30 pm to NIH
quote:No. But I'd be interested in seeing you string together a cogent argument and make that case. Since you're so sure it should be a pretty simple exercise. I would caution that assuming that the collusion case is closed based upon paragraph 6 of this indictment requires you to make a number of assumptions you aren't in a position to make incl: 1. These 16 individuals/entities are the final indictments in the information ops line of inquiry and 2. There are no other suspected instances of Trump team-Russia coordination in the other lines of inquiry. So we're throwing out Flynn, Papadopoulous, the Trump tower meeting, the sharing of actual "hacked" information from the DNC and other intrusions, and whatever else might be revealed by the financial crimes line of the investigation (including Gates, Manafort, and other Trump-linked persons and entities).
The investigation is not over but the "collusion" argument as it pertains to hacking the election is toast.
And no one is saying the collusion piece is there. But saying it's been ruled out by today's indictments seems a bit silly, no?
4
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:32 pm to Navytiger74
Calm down
The language is there for you to read. Honest Bob and his team wrote it. A.) Russian hackers never revealed their identities
B.) "associated with the campaign" = "unwitting".
If you want to imagine more Russian boogeymen and talk about people who have already been indicted, feel free. If you have a problem with the special counsel, email Honest Bob.
The language is there for you to read. Honest Bob and his team wrote it. A.) Russian hackers never revealed their identities
B.) "associated with the campaign" = "unwitting".
If you want to imagine more Russian boogeymen and talk about people who have already been indicted, feel free. If you have a problem with the special counsel, email Honest Bob.
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:32 pm to Navytiger74
So, basically the theory is, there's something else out there, but we needed to get this out and moving now? Why? Is the bad shite you're suspecting completely different than with these folks? Was this just the Russian JV team?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
. But I'd be interested in seeing you string together a cogent argument and make that case.
i'd love to hear you string together a cogent argument to explain how there was actual collusion greater than knowledge
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:34 pm to Navytiger74
They indicted Russians for what you do here every day, trolling their asses off. Better hope honest Bob doesn’t take a peek at your post history. 
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News