re: Wray confirms:White House Was Warned of Aide’s Background Months Earlier Than Acknowledged

This is a weak narrative. That's why people dont care.

You can't blame republicans for creating weak narratives, here. Liberals who've been embroiled in one sex scandal after the other for 20 plus years, are not the right group to push this type of narrative anyway. The idea that him slapping his old lady back in the day made him a national security risk is a huge reach -- a sad attempt to wring the last drop of mileage out of a story that didn't have the pop dems hoped for.

It falls flat for a number of reasons, none of them are the fault of republicans.

quote:

---

Insert it in any thread that is halfway critical of the Trump administration

Weird times

---

That's how the security clearance investigations go...
You do it, appeal, wait...

Once activity done, they find you a job where they can use you until they fire you or get a job and keep you off clearance...

But believe it or not, while you're under investigation, you have a clearance if you held one previously.

For the WH to take a month and a half is typical, because firing has to go through HR legalese.

Not really anything...now if this means it's critical of the administration, it's technically critical of the system that's been in place for 20+ years.