- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems leak their rebuttal memo to NBC; NBC actually publishes it
Posted on 2/3/18 at 7:01 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Posted on 2/3/18 at 7:01 pm to Lsuhoohoo
No. This:
quote:
undisputed fact: the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court found probable cause to believe that Carter Page—a member of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team—was an agent of the Russian government.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 7:07 pm to reggielendale
quote:Their evidence was goldenshowers, testified under oath to not have any credibility. They planted the Russian lawyer and probably planted Page.
No. This:
undisputed fact: the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court found probable cause to believe that Carter Page—a member of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team—was an agent of the Russian government.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 7:14 pm to reggielendale
it's just a bunch of circular arguments with 0 supporting evidence. Pretty funny they bitch about a lack of facts and then dump out this turd
~Page was under surveillance before
~Carter Page was probably a Russian agent
~The DOJ requested a FISA warrant on him so obviously they had something on him
~And Page was under surveillance before
~Page was probably a Russian agent
~Page was under surveillance before
~Carter Page was probably a Russian agent
~The DOJ requested a FISA warrant on him so obviously they had something on him
~And Page was under surveillance before
~Page was probably a Russian agent
Posted on 2/3/18 at 7:46 pm to reggielendale
You can’t be serious, right?!
This quote says nothing more than “The FISA court granted a surveillance warrant on Carter Page” - yeah that’s an undisputed fact. Point me to where anybody has said that the FISA court didn’t approve the warrant.
You see, just because it’s dressed up with the words “found probable cause”, undoubtedly to fool idiots like yourself into buying it, this “counterargument” isn’t actually an argument at all. What Democrats need to produce, is documented evidence that PROVES the dossier wasn’t the only evidence used to gain the warrant to spy on “Page.”
Nunes memo alleges that McCabe testified under oath that without the dossier, no warrant would’ve been received. Democrats say he didn’t say that. Easiest thing to do would be release the transcript of Mccabes testimony, or at a minimum, that portion of it. Dems don’t want to do that- care to tell us why??
And if the story is that he was already being surveilled, meaning they obviously had evidence to get prior warrants approved, why did they need the dossier at all? Seems they could’ve saved themselves the embarrassment of using such a ridiculously unbelievable document.
On the other hand, if the story is that he wasn’t already being surveilled, then how would the fbi have any other evidence he was acting as a foreign agent ???-unless of course they had been “spying” on him without a warrant..like say, ILLEGALLY allowing “private contractors” (ie:FusionGPS) access to the NSA database to do thousands of “about queries” on “us persons”. Seems like the FISC issued a report about similar abuses last year. What a coincidence.
quote:
undisputed fact: the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court found probable cause to believe that Carter Page—a member of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team—was an agent of the Russian government.
This quote says nothing more than “The FISA court granted a surveillance warrant on Carter Page” - yeah that’s an undisputed fact. Point me to where anybody has said that the FISA court didn’t approve the warrant.
You see, just because it’s dressed up with the words “found probable cause”, undoubtedly to fool idiots like yourself into buying it, this “counterargument” isn’t actually an argument at all. What Democrats need to produce, is documented evidence that PROVES the dossier wasn’t the only evidence used to gain the warrant to spy on “Page.”
Nunes memo alleges that McCabe testified under oath that without the dossier, no warrant would’ve been received. Democrats say he didn’t say that. Easiest thing to do would be release the transcript of Mccabes testimony, or at a minimum, that portion of it. Dems don’t want to do that- care to tell us why??
And if the story is that he was already being surveilled, meaning they obviously had evidence to get prior warrants approved, why did they need the dossier at all? Seems they could’ve saved themselves the embarrassment of using such a ridiculously unbelievable document.
On the other hand, if the story is that he wasn’t already being surveilled, then how would the fbi have any other evidence he was acting as a foreign agent ???-unless of course they had been “spying” on him without a warrant..like say, ILLEGALLY allowing “private contractors” (ie:FusionGPS) access to the NSA database to do thousands of “about queries” on “us persons”. Seems like the FISC issued a report about similar abuses last year. What a coincidence.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News