re: Why was my thread about my sea serpent sighting anchored?

quote:

---

6. A thread has gone off topic. If the replies inside a thread have nothing to do with the main idea in the subject, we often anchor.

---

quote:

---

Read the sticky at the top. Your thread clearly violates the off topic rule after the first few pages. It turns in to you and a bunch of others yahoos arguing and not mentioning the theory of sea serpents at all.

---

First of all, I don't appreciate you calling me a "yahoo".

Next, I'm already aware of that sticky.

I figured that would be the excuse used to anchor my thread.

My thread isn't about discussing the theory of sea serpents.

That's why I specifically entitled my thread, "For those people interested in my sea serpent sighting and video" not "Let's discuss the theory of sea serpents".

When some skeptics invaded the thread and started insulting me then I had no choice but to defend myself and in the process I gave the skeptics information about my sightings and videos.

When someone posts something disagreeing with me in a civil manner then I respond in a civil manner.

For example, when someone claimed that I just saw an oarfish then I very civilly went into great detail to explain to them why the animal I saw wasn't an oarfish.

I have no problem having a civil discussion with skeptics but apparently skeptics have a problem being civil to me.

Then someone created a sockpuppet and tried to pass it as a sockpuppet created by me.

Am I supposed to sit back and let someone discredit my character like that?

HELL NO!!!

There's one poster out there who knows they are the person who created the sockpuppet and that person isn't me.

Now you can use whatever excuse you want to anchor my thread because I've dealt with the skeptics on this site the way they deserved to be dealt with.

My sightings and videos of sea serpents are already known about all over the world so I don't need to waste any more of my time discussing it here with some skeptics who just insult me and don't appreciate the information I have to give them.

I am ending the discussion on the thread so the skeptics get what they want.

BTW, I don't care how many biased skeptics down vote me.