- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Democrats, this is what a Dreamer looks like.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:00 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:00 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
So no analysis or argument as to why? Just “they have to go back”?
Here’s my argument. They. Are. Illegal. Got any other feelings you need to get out tonight? Ms Boosie not showing you enough attention while she’s watching Real Housewives of Atlanta?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:01 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Fun thing about kids is they lack the capacity to be legally responsible for their actions in a civil sense.
So you think going back is a punishment?
What do you think of the word "shithole"?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:02 pm to Errerrerrwere
What did you do to become a citizen?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:06 pm to Errerrerrwere
That’s it. That’s my point.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:07 pm to Stingray
I think shithole is accurate and it’s a fake controversy that the media has tired to make such an issue of it.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:07 pm to TigernMS12
Sure you aren't TigernMS13?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:08 pm to TigernMS12
Well, your point falls on deaf ears. I am one of the fortunate members of this world that was born in this great nation.
Sucks that there are shitholes out there overbreeding their children into more shitholes.
Have any other stupid frickng points you’d like to make?
Sucks that there are shitholes out there overbreeding their children into more shitholes.
Have any other stupid frickng points you’d like to make?
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:08 pm to boosiebadazz
They should be alllowed to stay if they did not commit any crimes. They also should not be allowed to vote.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:09 pm to Errerrerrwere
Any comments on the mens rea component of the supposedly illegal actions of the then-minor children of being brought here involuntarily?
Ms. Boosie is doing well; thanks for your concern.
Ms. Boosie is doing well; thanks for your concern.
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:09 pm to NIH
Agree. But they have to go through what the young lady went through in the OP. And we get a slew of shut from tDonald’s list that we want.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:09 pm to Errerrerrwere
I’d imigine you also want to end birth right citizenship as well
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:11 pm to boosiebadazz
WTF is wrong with you?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:11 pm to NIH
What about a path to citizenship? You lay out the guidelines, but theoretically open to it?
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:12 pm to LSU Patrick
That I don’t agree with punishing one for the sins of their parents?
Not sure there’s really anything wrong with that? But I’m sure you’ll enlighten me
Not sure there’s really anything wrong with that? But I’m sure you’ll enlighten me
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:13 pm to boosiebadazz
I don’t have a problem with their right to citizenship. Their parents broke the law; and they shouldn’t be allowed.
But they need to wait in line like the rest. We don’t give free shot just because these 32 year old “kids” had their parents smuggle them in.
But they need to wait in line like the rest. We don’t give free shot just because these 32 year old “kids” had their parents smuggle them in.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:16 pm to Errerrerrwere
So your issue is just the timing of their citizenship/ being here legally?
You don’t have an issue on the merits of them being here if they’re not felons, etc.? Just that they “cut the line”?
Now that we’ve established it’s a technical objection and not an ideological objection to them being a part of society, what’s the argument for uprooting their lives versus the “harm” imposed by them being allowed to stay (with new laws regarding no felonies, back taxes, etc.)?
You don’t have an issue on the merits of them being here if they’re not felons, etc.? Just that they “cut the line”?
Now that we’ve established it’s a technical objection and not an ideological objection to them being a part of society, what’s the argument for uprooting their lives versus the “harm” imposed by them being allowed to stay (with new laws regarding no felonies, back taxes, etc.)?
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 1/23/18 at 10:16 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
This young woman waited in line, studied tirelessly to learn to speak English, fell asleep in Her American History and Naturalization text books and EARNED her right to call herself an American.
Because she wanted a job that didn't suck arse.
Non-Born here - Dreamers can only dream to go to Cali - get a DL - and fool government, immigration and colleges and employers if they get paid under the table.
Otherwise...picking lettuce for life.
That's why the Dems love them - free votes from people who are going to be at the bottom of the totem pole for life.
Dems don't like acheivers...they like subservient votes...poor minority votes. Dems love America having a HUGE peasant class. Peasants. Dems lifeblood, huge peasant class.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News