Sometimes people who break the law are allowed to avoid charges. Lawfully.

Pardoned felons like Arpaio.
Government informants.
690 thousand people brought here illegally.

GOP is not negotiating with Dems to enforce the law. They're negotiating with dems who want to change the law.

Dems are standing ground on an issue that sides with "illegals" based on humanitarian and economic grounds. If they have been here their entire lives, contributing to our system (point of debate obviously), it makes sense to allow them to continue.

Most in this board will now raise pitchforks at the notion, but his is playing out exactly how checks and balances are supposed to work. The party in power is experiencing resistance from the minority. As responsible leaders, its their job to govern responsibly and not demand that the opposition bend to their might.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SlowFlowPro

Simple Solutions to Complex Probs

Member since Jan 2004

424890 posts

Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:03 am to victoire sécurisé

quote:
The party in power is experiencing resistance from the minority. As responsible leaders, its their job to govern responsibly and not demand that the opposition bend to their might.

this justification is only allowed when the GOP is in power

when the DEMs are in power "Trying to do good" and the GOP is the opposition party, the narrative is "obstruction" or "the party of no"

for an example, Let me know when Time runs a similar hit piece on the current DEMs

also, what is responsible about choosing people who violated the law over citizens who have citizen children who need health care? how is THAT rational or responsible? that's the choice the DEMs made...DACA over CHIP

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board