- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Screw Every “Fan” Not Giving Ensminger and O A Chance
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:22 am to Wayne Campbell
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:22 am to Wayne Campbell
True. But you will get a general consensus of probably 5-10 names that everyone will agree should be in the discussion for the best.
While the above is true, if you hire one of the 5-10, those in favor of the other's will say "you lied". Each and every coach has to go with who he thinks is best and live or die with that decision. Hell, it could be argued that Saban, with one notable exception, hasn't ever hired the best OC at Bama. The best partnerships are not necessarily built on combined talent, but who works best together and compliment each other. To many egos involved to be other wise. I believe this is why many coaches don't do as well when hired away from their initial success.
While the above is true, if you hire one of the 5-10, those in favor of the other's will say "you lied". Each and every coach has to go with who he thinks is best and live or die with that decision. Hell, it could be argued that Saban, with one notable exception, hasn't ever hired the best OC at Bama. The best partnerships are not necessarily built on combined talent, but who works best together and compliment each other. To many egos involved to be other wise. I believe this is why many coaches don't do as well when hired away from their initial success.
2
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:28 am to TigerCop817
quote:
While the above is true, if you hire one of the 5-10, those in favor of the other's will say "you lied".
I don't think I'm alone in saying that everyone here would be much happier if we were arguing over whether or not LSU hired the best of the top 10 OCs or not.
Instead, like last year's HC hire, we the fans are left holding our collective dick in our hands trying to figure out why someone was hired that literally no other P5 school would have even interviewed.
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:29 am to TigerCop817
quote:
But you will get a general consensus of probably 5-10 names that everyone will agree should be in the discussion for the best.
Is Steve Ensminger on this list of the Top 5-10 names that are generally agreed to?
Is he, do you think, in the Top 20?
Top 50?
If he is, why was he not somewhere else being paid for this job, and if not...what difference does it make if there is no agreed upon #1 if the guy Orgeron chose is agreed upon to not been in the Top 50?
It may be true that it's impossible to say who is #1...but it's not impossible to say that someone is not considered to be in that top tier. and that is, ultimately the point despite so many attempts at diversion.
This post was edited on 1/12/18 at 9:31 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News