Started By
Message

re: Canada and Orgeron : The story

Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:26 pm to
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
14563 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

The answer to the question of why would Canada take a lesser buyout if he wasn't doing the things being said is because doing so allowed him the possibility to make even more money going forward. Whether he will or not I'm not sure.

Why would Canada drop the possibility of the full contract up front? Didn't every other buyout to former LSU staff have terms that "if" they got new employment that would offset LSU's financial responsibility?
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:28 pm to
I've seen Jester try to explain this to you mutilple times in the thread. It's apparent you just do not understand the concept here. I don't know what else to tell you.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34519 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:28 pm to
quote:


Why would Canada drop the possibility of the full contract up front? Didn't every other buyout to former LSU staff have terms that "if" they got new employment that would offset LSU's financial responsibility?


Yes, but that is using the contract-stipulated buyout language. The $1.75M buyout language removes that language to make for a more straight-forward agreement for both parties. His coaching contract is thus null and void moving forward.
This post was edited on 1/10/18 at 12:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram