- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about Dunkirk
Posted on 1/2/18 at 1:55 pm to EyeTwentyNole
Posted on 1/2/18 at 1:55 pm to EyeTwentyNole
quote:
Because Nolan shite his pants with this one.
What was wrong with Dunkirk? I thought it was a great movie.
2
Posted on 1/4/18 at 11:05 am to BugAC
quote:
What was wrong with Dunkirk? I thought it was a great movie.
It was a pretty good suspense film. Other than that I found it disappointing. The reviews were completely overblown IMO and labeled it one of the best WWII movies ever. Definitely not.
I feel like it really missed the mark of encapsulating what actually transpired at Dunkirk but of course that wasn't Nolan's objective. I wish it was.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 11:59 am to BugAC
Finally watched this last night for the first time, and while I thought it was a good movie, I think Nolan missed the mark on telling the full story and capturing the epic scale of the real-life event. The real Dunkirk involved thousands of British civilians banding together and putting themselves (and ther boats) at huge personal risk to save over 300,000 trapped soldiers. I feel like the movie totally missed the mark on this, making it look more like a small-scale conflict where a few pilots and ship captains saved the day.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News