- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Curious as to board’s opinion on KS austerity...
Posted on 12/20/17 at 9:23 am to bonhoeffer45
Posted on 12/20/17 at 9:23 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
They did cut spending, a lot in fact.
That a very different story than the data appear to tell.
Total expenditures, pulled from kansas.gov :
2011 $25,967,946,724.89
2012 $26,438,228,264.19
2013 $26,336,404,096.12
2014 $26,626,277,760.34
2015 $28,932,650,810.51
2016 $30,640,682,256.73
2017 $28,568,688,397.76
Posted on 12/20/17 at 11:08 am to 90proofprofessional
I don't see spending cuts in there.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 11:36 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
That a very different story than the data appear to tell.
I mean inflation doesn’t just go away because you cut spending. And that is just one slice of the Kansas budget.
But I guess I’m not really seeing the point you are trying to get at?
The argument from Brownback and Republicans has been that tax cuts, especially tax cuts targeted at the wealthy and wealthy businesses, will produce enough new revenue from jolting growth that it will actually increase revenue. Neither of those things happened in Kansas. Brownback famously promised 100,000 private sector jobs from his tax policy. He added 14,000. Which even lagged neighboring states.
Brownback absolutely did cut spending, and cut spending in those places Republicans always go on about: education, healthcare, public safety, environment, pensions, transportation, payroll. But the immediate problem with that is those cuts often have a growth depressing effect. You are taking money away from programs that often are immediately spent or used. At least at a much higher rate than the tax cuts you are replacing them with. So it becomes a double problem. You are simultaneously attempting to cut taxes as a means to stimulate growth, but you are cutting off your nose by simultaneously cutting spending that depresses GDP.
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 11:39 am
Posted on 12/20/17 at 12:21 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
That a very different story than the data appear to tell. Total expenditures, pulled from kansas.gov : 2011 $25,967,946,724.89 2012 $26,438,228,264.19 2013 $26,336,404,096.12 2014 $26,626,277,760.34 2015 $28,932,650,810.51 2016 $30,640,682,256.73 2017 $28,568,688,397.76
Remember...
Slowing rate of expenditure growth is considered a cut in liberal land
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News