- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 6 of the top 10 Louisiana players still uncommitted
Posted on 12/20/17 at 12:34 pm to Ace Midnight
Posted on 12/20/17 at 12:34 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
we get Marshall, your point is moot.
How is my point moot? My point is we are weak in landing Top 10 players from LA in 2018.
If we add Marshall that makes 4, add Joseph is 5. 5 of 10 is weak, and by some miracle we pull one more (not certain who could be 6 at this point), I would still believe it’s weak.
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 12:35 pm
3
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:14 pm to alumni95
Dig deeper, bro
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:14 pm to alumni95
Dumbass
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:18 pm to alumni95
dafuq are you talking about man?
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:41 pm to bnb9433
247 LA 2018 recruits
247 is the more widely accepted rankings
1 Marshall
2 Rogers - TCU
3 Joseph
4 Chase
5 Jason - State
6 Keys
7 Baskerville - LSU
8 Harris - Kansas
9 Cotton - LSU
10 Jones - LSU
What are YOU taking about?
247 is the more widely accepted rankings
1 Marshall
2 Rogers - TCU
3 Joseph
4 Chase
5 Jason - State
6 Keys
7 Baskerville - LSU
8 Harris - Kansas
9 Cotton - LSU
10 Jones - LSU
What are YOU taking about?
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:45 pm to TigerBait2008
Says another? Great analysis
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:48 pm to alumni95
Alumni is an O bashing troll. Forget him he is truly an idiot.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:48 pm to Nomojeaux
find ONE post where I bashed O
Just one, is all you need to find. Good luck with that.
Just one, is all you need to find. Good luck with that.
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:52 pm to alumni95
You think I'm gonna waste time going through your posts? I've seen you in several threads bashing him and the program. Just like you are doing now. Didn't occur to your dumbass that Lsu didn't even want some of that too 10 and Louisiana is down this year. This is a hell of a class addressing needs that la didn't offer. Jesus.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 1:53 pm to Nomojeaux
Bald faced lie... you won’t look, because you already looked through 5-6 pages and couldn’t find a single one, because it doesn’t exist.
For the record, I’m very happy with the beef we got in this class and the overall needs we met. (You CAN find that in my post history). I’m just disappointed we didn’t lock down LA. 4 or 5 out of 10 is weak. I stand by my opinion.
For the record, I’m very happy with the beef we got in this class and the overall needs we met. (You CAN find that in my post history). I’m just disappointed we didn’t lock down LA. 4 or 5 out of 10 is weak. I stand by my opinion.
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 12/20/17 at 2:11 pm to alumni95
quote:
How is my point moot?
Mootish - I mean, we need a QB and if we don't get one, having lost the only QB to TCU will be the exception that proves the rule.
quote:
If we add Marshall that makes 4, add Joseph is 5. 5 of 10 is weak,
If we get Keys, is 6 out of 10 weak?
Because if we don't get Keys, but we have Surtain, Joseph and Cook, then I would say that Keys is Moot at that point. Like I said, Marshall is the top WR. Jenkins and Jason are comparable. Taking one of the 2 isn't bad. Losing Keys, for example, but ending with Joseph AND Cook behind Surtain? I'm not sweating that one either.
So, at that point, we have to evaluate the QB we do get (if we get one) versus losing Rogers.
That's why moot*.
*Depends on finish, particularly QB.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 2:13 pm to alumni95
Composite man. It collects all and is most accurate.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 2:43 pm to tigerbru17
quote:
Composite man. It collects all and is most accurate.
Exactly, but bnb9433 conveniently does not use the composite in his screen shot. Because it does not support his argument.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 2:53 pm to Nomojeaux
quote:
You think I'm gonna waste time going through your posts?
Why not? You seem to have plenty of free time considering that you registered on 12/19 and have over 450 posts. You don't seem to have much of a life outside of calling anyone with an opinion other than yours an idiot.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 2:55 pm to alumni95
Yeah, we should have dropped guys like Surtain for Harris and we also should've gotten rid of some of those desperately needed lineman to make room for all 5 WR's in the LA top 10. 
Posted on 12/20/17 at 2:55 pm to alumni95
quote:
1 Marshall
2 Rogers - TCU
3 Joseph
4 Chase
5 Jason - State
6 Keys
7 Baskerville - LSU
8 Harris - Kansas
9 Cotton - LSU
10 Jones - LSU
Three of these guys weren't even takes as of today.
Posted on 12/20/17 at 3:12 pm to tigerbru17
quote:
Composite man. It collects all and is most accurate.
My list IS 247 COMPOSITE. The joker with the screenshot is likely using ESPN or something else.
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 12/20/17 at 3:13 pm to whitefoot
quote:
Three of these guys weren't even takes as of today.
Harris and which other 2???
Posted on 12/20/17 at 3:16 pm to alumni95
Keys and Jason
Posted on 12/20/17 at 3:34 pm to alumni95
quote:
Harris and which other 2???
you are a frickin idiot. Yea lets sign 7 receiver just to make sure we have most of the top 10 in LA.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News