re: Steelers related - what’s the rule for catching?

Yeah as several people have already pointed out, I don't think it was conclusive that the ball even hit the ground. His hand was under it. Even under the perplexing NFL rules about what constitutes a 'catch', that call should have stood. If the ball did not touch the ground, he maintained possession through the ground. At BEST it was inconclusive if the ball made contact with the ground, call on field should have stood. This was an atrocious call and the officials/NFL officials in NY or wherever who review plays should have to account for it. They are compromising the integrity of the game at this point, not to mention foiling the hard work that the players put in and pissing off the fans that make the league a cash cow.