Started By
Message

re: It's glorious watching reddit, libs, and cucks melt over NN repeal

Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:47 pm to
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:47 pm to
I like how so much of the reasoning people give for being anti-NN has more to do with Obama, melts, and lib tearz than any substantive benefits of repealing NN.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66563 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:48 pm to
Exactly.
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46527 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

I like how so much of the reasoning people give for being anti-NN has more to do with Obama, melts, and lib tearz than any substantive benefits of repealing NN.


less government involvement and a win for capitalism are substantive benefits

even if the NN repeal goes bad, it may make people do stuff in the real world that don't involve the internet. the horror
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59193 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

like how so much of the reasoning people give for being anti-NN has more to do with Obama, melts, and lib tearz


I agree That is the sad state of our political discourse.

quote:

any substantive benefits of repealing NN.


I favor markets not using 1930s regs s on 21st century tech. I think this fear that these ISPs will just arbitrarily block sites is fear mongering. There is no good business reasons to piss Off customers. And if they did start blocking sites we can always revisit NN in the future it’s not like what’s passed now is permanent and can never be changed and maybe we could tailor regs rather than 1 size fits all

I see no problem with fast lanes. How is it substantively different from day pay channels when cable was introduced? Also if certain sites like Netflix use more bandwidth then treating all traffic as neutral is benefiting content providers ie big corporations.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 3:56 pm
Posted by Blob Fish
Member since Mar 2016
3091 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

I like how so much of the reasoning people give for being anti-NN has more to do with Obama, melts, and lib tearz than any substantive benefits of repealing NN.


This. I’m as MAGA as they come, and I have yet to hear an argument against net neutrality that was different than these:

1) Remove government from the internet
2) Stick it to Obama
3) Watch the melt
4) Well, we’ve lived without it before

None of those are merits. We need SOME government regulation. Currently, if you don’t like your internet/cable provider, you can’t do dick about it. But at least you can cancel cable and stream. (Although, they jacked up my internet cost to $70 per month for doing that. Oh goodie. I could get it for $20 per month if I bundled it with $100 worth of channels I don’t want.)

Now, I understand you’ll call it “fearmongering”, but why would the cable companies allow this now? They will either slow it down or make it expensive. It’s just common sense.

It’s not capitalism. It’s corporatism disguised as capitalism.

My hope is that Google Fiber starts making progress and dominating these blackmailing assholes.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 4:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram