Started By
Message

re: How did they justify the Steinle verdict?

Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:03 pm to
Posted by winston318
Oklahoma City,OK
Member since Sep 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:03 pm to
Simple. The science said that it was an accident. This should have never gone to trial. The bullet hit the ground and bounced up.
Gun accidents happen all of the time. Remember when Chaney shot that guy. He didn't have a trial because it was an accident
Posted by WONTONGO
Member since Oct 2007
4299 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Remember when Chaney shot that guy. He didn't have a trial because it was an accident


Pretty sure they didn't have a trial because the guy he shot wasn't killed, and he was a friend who didn't press charges. Had he pressed charges I'm pretty sure there would have been a trial.
Posted by tigress4life
BR
Member since May 2007
956 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:22 pm to
Cheney was in a group that was hunting at the time of that real accident. It WAS investigated and the guy didn't die. In fact his deposition supported Cheney's and the other members of the hunting party on what happened.

What the f*ck was this POS hunting on a pier in downtown San Fran. A seagull?

B.S. Even if you believe the POS IT IS at least negligent homicide.

"ricochet"? So you ASSume he's a good marksman? Frickin idjit
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram