- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nebraska hasn’t had a rushing TD since 9/29
Posted on 11/10/17 at 6:45 pm to rocket31
Posted on 11/10/17 at 6:45 pm to rocket31
Adding Nebraska wasn't terrible, but adding Maryland and Rutgers was atrocious.
The Big 10 should have added Mizzou and Notre Dame, or Iowa State or West Virginia.
Only some idiot bean counter would believe that adding Maryland or Rutgers would be better for the conference just because those states have large populations. Why does that matter when their fanbases are only a small subset of those populations?
The Big 10 should have added Mizzou and Notre Dame, or Iowa State or West Virginia.
Only some idiot bean counter would believe that adding Maryland or Rutgers would be better for the conference just because those states have large populations. Why does that matter when their fanbases are only a small subset of those populations?
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 6:47 pm
4
Posted on 11/10/17 at 6:49 pm to kingbob
Maryland is up and coming.
They'll be top 25 next year.
They'll be top 25 next year.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 6:58 pm to kingbob
quote:
Adding Nebraska wasn't terrible, but adding Maryland and Rutgers was atrocious.
The Big 10 should have added Mizzou and Notre Dame, or Iowa State or West Virginia.
Only some idiot bean counter would believe that adding Maryland or Rutgers would be better for the conference just because those states have large populations. Why does that matter when their fanbases are only a small subset of those populations?
in case you didn't know, ND doesn't want to join the big 10 in FB, let alone any conference. they're fiercely independent. they've been invited formally and informally, and they've refused multiple times
second, what do you mean by better for the conference? maryland and rutgers were added due to their populations as well as their fertile recruiting grounds. not only has the value of the conference increased due to the NY/NJ and DC areas, the big name teams in the conference now have greater access to those areas with regards to recruiting
on the contrary, what would adding WV or iowa state add in terms of $$$ or recruiting?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 8:20 pm to kingbob
quote:
The Big 10 should have added Notre Dame
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:25 pm to kingbob
quote:
The Big 10 should have added Mizzou and Notre Dame, or Iowa State or West Virginia.
Where do you baws get this Notre Dame-Big Ten thing from?
It will never happen, and quite frankly, it should never happen.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News