- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My issues with stranger things season 2 (spoiler thread)
Posted on 11/5/17 at 2:23 pm to Arksulli
Posted on 11/5/17 at 2:23 pm to Arksulli
quote:
Oh dear. He didn't reprogram the computer, he flipped the main breaker and then entered a few basic commands to start the system back up. Computers were not particularly advanced back in the 80's, anyone with any computer knowledge could have pulled that off.
Assuming BASIC programming was necessary to restart that system was like typing JCL into an Atari 400 and expecting it to do something. What he did was write four nested loops to exhaustively search a four digit password by calling a "checkPassword" subroutine, which is plausible but requires him to find a system running BASIC that's hooked into the security system and advertises the name of a subroutine that has no lockout protection, and none of it works if it isn't a simple short length PIN he's after.
quote:
It was amazingly realistic actually. Far more so then most movies and TV shows manage to pull off.
It at least made some sense compared to the snippets of code and exposition gibberish you see in most shows, but Bob's surety of his assumptions and ease of carrying them out were anything but "realistic."
Posted on 11/9/17 at 2:11 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
It at least made some sense compared to the snippets of code and exposition gibberish you see in most shows
Case in point, the code snippet Michael was asked to debug in Star Trek Discovery E03. In the midst of a bunch of commented out Windows SDK function declarations was a code fragment apparently not belonging to a function, which cannot compile. FFS, the Discovery is running on 1990s Windows NT and being programmed in C by dumbasses?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News