- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Business Report: Land Based Casino a likely possibility in Baton Rouge
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:22 pm to someLSUdoosh
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:22 pm to someLSUdoosh
quote:
You sure about it being all over water?
I just looked at the satellite images. It's literally sitting in (what i assume is man made) a pond basically the same size and shape as the casino. It made me laugh out loud. What a stupid law.
ETA: The casino portion that is. Everything else is on land. Also why was this ever a thing in the first place? Is there some moral benefit to not having a brick and mortar building or something?
This post was edited on 11/1/17 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:26 pm to jlovel7
quote:
What a stupid law.
Of course it is.
A study of laws regarding louisiana gambling would be hilarious
How did harrahs nola get a land grant when every other casino had to be on a boat?
I mean jesus h tap dancing christ
Posted on 11/1/17 at 12:29 pm to jlovel7
quote:
The casino portion that is. Everything else is on land. Also why was this ever a thing in the first place? Is there some moral benefit to not having a brick and mortar building or something?
Initially it had to be a boat and maintain a cruise schedule.
Belle of Baton Rouge and Casino Rouge used to drive around the river, as gaming wasn't technically legal on land. That's why The Belle is a cramped, multi level boat built on top of a barge platform.
They removed the requirement that they actually operate a cruise schedule, and the newer casinos got much nicer (L'auberge). Having them locate a much more flexible, more open casino floor right next to the hotels, restaurants, and parking would probably enable nicer properties.
It would probably be better for both revenue and tourism if Casinos like The Belle were allowed to move to a space actually designed to be a Casino on land.
Posted on 11/1/17 at 3:52 pm to jlovel7
batture land is considered water in terms of this law.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 10:41 pm to jlovel7
quote:
Also why was this ever a thing in the first place? Is there some moral benefit to not having a brick and mortar building or something?
When casino gambling was legalized in LA the law allowed for one land based casino license and twelve (I think) "riverboat" casinos. The land based license included certain guarantees (min. square footage, min. # of employees, min. payments regardless of profitability) to the state in exchange for having a land based monopoly. It also allowed EWE to extort the maximum amount from the competing gaming companies.
The "riverboats" had to sail for a minimum period (I think it was originally 3 hours) and a minimum number of times daily, unless maritime conditions were unsafe. The casinos used this to their advantage, because nobody wanted to be stuck on the boat after they'd lost their rent money. All of them had high profiles, so winds over X mph made it "unsafe" to sail. The one on the N.O. Riverfront stopped sailing whenever the river was high. Eventually, none of them were sailing, but the law still said the casino had to be over water. This is how some ended up being built in artificial lakes only slightly larger than the gaming floor itself.
I'm pretty sure the law still only allows for one land based casino. Harrah's paid a premium for their license. I doubt they'll agree to another land based casino w/o receiving some type of compensation.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News