- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's end a talking Point: Just WHO was on the CFIUS that approved uranium ONE
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:01 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:01 pm to boosiebadazz
So your link takes me to an opinion article of the head of Red Branch Law & Consulting.
And what does Red Branch Law & Consulting do? From their website, "Redbranch Law and Consulting-Specializing in Homeland Security and Privacy Solutions". And their last paragraph reads:
Let's look a little closer at the closing line of their self advertisement!
Well call me unimpressed with the unbiased expert you quote! How did that go again?! We can guide corporations and foreign governments as they navigate these treacherous waters.
And what does Red Branch Law & Consulting do? From their website, "Redbranch Law and Consulting-Specializing in Homeland Security and Privacy Solutions". And their last paragraph reads:
quote:
In short, few in the United States know as much about the homeland security paradigm as we do at Red Branch Law & Consulting. We know how the system works and we know the players within the system. We know what foreign concerns are and we understand how the rest of the world is slowly migrating towards a homeland security model similar, at least to some degree, on that developed in the United States. There are many opportunities in the changing world and many pitfalls. We can guide corporations and foreign governments as they navigate these treacherous waters.
Let's look a little closer at the closing line of their self advertisement!
quote:
We can guide corporations and foreign governments as they navigate these treacherous waters.
Well call me unimpressed with the unbiased expert you quote! How did that go again?! We can guide corporations and foreign governments as they navigate these treacherous waters.
2
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:03 pm to Gaspergou202
this has been a total fail for poor boosie.Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:05 pm to CptBengal
quote:
WRONG.
go read the CFIUS website.
CFIUS can issue an order blocking the sale.
lol, WRONG again. Seriously, let's watch you boom yourself in 2 posts:
quote:
CFIUS may recommend to the President that the transaction be blocked. Only four transactions have been blocked or unwound by Presidential fiat in the history of CFIUS – two of those within the last year by Presidents Obama and Trump.
LINK
fricking imbecile.
Defend your pr0g filth aristocrats. Defend their criminality! You're winning!
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:06 pm to boosiebadazz
A temporary mitigation order
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:07 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Committee
issued a temporary mitigation order
do you know what that word means, filth?
and you went to law school?
seriously. ONLY the President can block a sale. the committee makes RECOMMENDATIONS. They say so on their own website. You even quoted it.
fricking imbecile.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:07 pm to Gaspergou202
Ah, attack the messenger, not the message.
Anything you would like to critique regarding the substance of the link?
Anything you would like to critique regarding the substance of the link?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:08 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Ah, attack the messenger, not the message.
want me to link where you do it?
fricking imbecile.
quote:
Anything you would like to critique regarding the substance of the link?
yeah, the BIAS.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:09 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Every member of the CFIUS board COULD block the sale with veto power as well as the Pres
quote:
WRONG.
go read the CFIUS website.
I'll even grant you the point because I don't care to parse out a temporary order blocking access or the sale versus the permanent block.
However, I'm still struggling to find the quid pro quo here now that we're parsed out the process a bit more.
Would you like to walk me through how Hillary herself hijacked the process and walked the sale through?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:10 pm to CptBengal
quote:
yeah, the BIAS.
The BIAS of what? Explaining the process?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Would you like to walk me through how Hillary herself hijacked the process and walked the sale through?
“I’m going to be the next president, and I have a lot of political capital with the rest of the committee. Cash, check, or wire?”
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:11 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I'll even grant you the point because I don't care to parse out a temporary order blocking access or the sale versus the permanent block.
parse out?
they're 2 different things.
Tell you what, you give me a thousand dollars, permanently. it;s like a temporary loan, right? just parsing.
fricking imbecile,
quote:
However, I'm still struggling to find the quid pro quo here
lol. Wait till the FBI guy testifies.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:14 pm to CptBengal
"I'm going to grant the temporary injunction prohibiting x until we have have a trial on the merits."
At that stage in the process, do I have the power to prohibit activity x?
But this is the minutiae you live for. Now that your narrative is being dissected and it's coming up hollow, I fully expect you to double down on this gotcha silliness.
Which one do you want to take next? Nuclear Regulatory Commission or export license?
At that stage in the process, do I have the power to prohibit activity x?
But this is the minutiae you live for. Now that your narrative is being dissected and it's coming up hollow, I fully expect you to double down on this gotcha silliness.
Which one do you want to take next? Nuclear Regulatory Commission or export license?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:19 pm to boosiebadazz
keep going. you can eventually dig out of your own idiocy by throwing enough replies at it!
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:26 pm to CptBengal
So no answer to the question?
Any answer to how Clinton circumvented or corrupted the process now that we know how extensive and layered it is?
Should we leave NRC and export licenses for another day?
Any answer to how Clinton circumvented or corrupted the process now that we know how extensive and layered it is?
Should we leave NRC and export licenses for another day?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:28 pm to boosiebadazz
Bill didnt take that money!
It never happened!
that FBI witness is lying!
Theyre all after your hero, hillary!
a vast right wing conspiracy!
It never happened!
that FBI witness is lying!
Theyre all after your hero, hillary!
a vast right wing conspiracy!
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:31 pm to CptBengal
presented with facts and you respond with garbage
SAD
SAD
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:36 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
resented with facts
like your fact that temporary and permanent are the same?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:38 pm to CptBengal
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News