Started By
Message

re: "Two career" bands/artists

Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:57 am to
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:57 am to
quote:

AC/DC. After Bon's death no one expected a thing from them anymore. Then 'Back in Black' was released...


I'd thought of AC/DC, and what they pulled off was nearly unprecedented...but I stopped from mentioning them because commercially speaking, they were on an upward trend with Highway To Hell. But yeah, I'd be lying if I said I saw the success of Back In Black coming, lol...
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:01 am to
quote:

The ABB survived those tragedies, particularly Skydog, but it's hard to say they ever thrived again.

I actually thought they sounded as good with Haynes and Trucks as with Betts & Duane.

quote:

Fair enough - they still had commercial value as a touring act, but I don't think that's what the OP is talking about.

If commercial success is the yardstick then you're probably right. They didn't sell that many records in the 00's.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18553 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:05 am to
Alice in Chains

Their new music with William DuVall is fantastic. They may not be as mainstream as they were in the 90s with Staley but it's still a "second career" and there was a 14 year gap between the AiC self titled album and their first with DuVall.
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:15 am to
How about Pink Floyd? While The Final Cut wasn't necessarily a bomb, it was a commercial disappointment on the heels of The Wall, and the tension (putting it mildly) between bandmembers resulted in Waters dissolving the group. Flash-forward several years, they release 2 albums without Waters (much to his chagrin, lol), and finish their career playing stadiums.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:23 am to
quote:

How about Pink Floyd?

I can see that. For me PF died when Waters left the band but I know a lot of people consider that era to be the "true" Pink Floyd.
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Skynyrd is the obvious answer


Missed this one. I dunno...I guess maybe the remaining members earned a respectable living when they got back together, but when the final draft of Skynyrd's legacy is written, how much of it is gonna include that era?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:26 am to
quote:

How about Pink Floyd?


There is almost the argument for 3 Pink Floyds:

Syd-led (although not too much commercial success)

Waters-led (massive sales and prickishness)

Gilmour-led (yeah, kindler and gentler, but they moved some units AND sold some concert tickets)

Totally get it and maybe the only arguable "triple" career.
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I can see that. For me PF died when Waters left the band but I know a lot of people consider that era to be the "true" Pink Floyd.


I prefer Waters in the band too, but no doubt it chapped his arse to see the other members filling up arenas & stadiums without him, lol
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Totally get it and maybe the only arguable "triple" career.

Fleetwood Mac?
1. Peter Green
2. Bob Welch
3. Buckingham/Nicks
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Fleetwood Mac? 1. Peter Green 2. Bob Welch 3. Buckingham/Nicks


Maybe - but Buckingham Nicks is the 600lb gorilla in the room - the Green and Welch eras may not be sufficiently distinctive enough. Hardcore fans may differ, I suppose.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 10:39 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I prefer Waters in the band too, but no doubt it chapped his arse to see the other members filling up arenas & stadiums without him, lol


That's a feel good story, though, as Waters is one of the greatest villainous pricks in all of music history - at least among the performers (he couldn't hold a candle to some of the producers, of course).
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Maybe - but Buckingham Nicks is the 600lb gorilla in the room - the Green and Welch eras may not be sufficiently distinctive enough. Hardcore fans may differ, I suppose.

I'm anything but hardcore when it comes to Fleetwood Mac. I liked Green & Welch. Didn't care for the Buckingham era at all but that's just my personal taste.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

I liked Green & Welch. Didn't care for the Buckingham era at all but that's just my personal taste.


No - I get that. I'm probably the other way - I don't listen to much Fleetwood Mac prior to the eponymous album, so maybe it's tougher for me to see Green and Welch as separate eras. But, I get that Green did 3 or so albums and Welch did 4, I think - obviously that's way more than Syd did with "original" PF and more than the Waterless Floyd did after The Final Cut.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 10:51 am
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18553 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:55 am to
Division Bell > Final Cut
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:56 am to
quote:

so maybe it's tougher for me to see Green and Welch as separate eras.

Those eras are separated in my mind by the "Fake Fleetwood Mac Era" of 1974. Bizarre.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Division Bell > Final Cut


I guess I just don't consider Final Cut a "Pink Floyd" album. "Not Now John" is a Pink Floyd single, but the rest of the album is just Waters, with special guests, Pink Floyd.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

I guess I just don't consider Final Cut a "Pink Floyd" album. "Not Now John" is a Pink Floyd single, but the rest of the album is just Waters, with special guests, Pink Floyd.

I agree, and Division Bell is just a Gilmour solo album (to me). It seems like you needed the tension between Waters and Gilmour for it to be authentic Floyd.
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6876 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:01 am to
Thought of Jefferson Airplane/Starship. I think they went through several incarnations: 60s Haight-ashbury, 70s with Marty Balin and 80s with "Built this City" and "Find Your Way Back".
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81962 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Didn't care for the Buckingham era at all
Yikes
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14680 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 11:07 am to
This might be a weak effort but Steely Dan. Never toured much in their prime but then reformed primarily as a touring band in the 90's. Released a couple of albums but never achieved any kind of commercial success (and honestly they weren't close to the level of their records in the 70's). However their live shows from mid-90's to the present (prior to Becker's death) were outstanding.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram