Started By
Message

re: SEC OLine comparison - 2 deep

Posted on 10/3/17 at 9:52 pm to
Posted by Le Tenia
Member since Feb 2015
4548 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Every time one of these threads is posted, there are posts like this saying but, but, but you didn’t consider this. Go look at this, go pull these stats. Then a day or so later someone posts a thread addressing the new issue and the goalposts move again.

For once, why don’t you do the leg work and prove your point rather than just constantly asking OP to change his analysis or add new fields.


Because I already know the answer and I don't even need to look at or evaluate other teams' "experienced, highly ranked" OL starters/depth. By using HS recruiting stars and how many years they have been on the team sitting the bench and not playing does not qualify said players as being= talented and experienced. That should be pretty easy to compute, even for you.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22205 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 9:54 pm to
So where’s your quantitative analysis pointing to LSU’s lack of talent or experience on the lines? If you already know the answer it should be easy enough to make your point using a few easy to find data points.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram