- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does Trump accept victory with grace?
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:55 am to Flavius Belisarius
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:55 am to Flavius Belisarius
quote:So they you're arguing that hey agreed with the basis of the protests? And now we know that they went unwilling to protest in the same way. So why would only 5 or 6 players protesting before, across all 32 teams, and out of 1696 players?
You're delusional. They responded that way because they agreed with the kneelers original protest
And despite 5 fewer teams on the field during the anthem, why 230ish players, out of 1440 (292 fewer) all of a sudden decide to protest even though they already in support of the method of protest AND the basis? And of those 1440 players they only had 2 of the previous protesters, so the prevalence increased by 115 times.
Yet, even with that data, arguing that the exponential increase was a result of Trump's comments--which is what the players actually reporting--is delusional.
And it's delusional because you say they actually protested for the exact same reasons
as they original protest, which is counter to what they stated, yet they weren't protested for that belief before? And it's delusional despite not providing any evidence to support your argument and to show that mine is delusional?
Isn't it odd that I'm basing my argument on objective and quantifiable data, that is supported by the protesters itself, yet you're not only in disagreement, you're calling that delusional?
When you call a hypothesis delusional with facts to support it, and then present a hypothesis with no support, and argue that it's the "truth," it's obvious that you don't actually care about the truth since it doesn't support what you WANT to be true.
A belief that something is certain, without evidence to support it but with evidence to dispute it, is actually a delusional belief by definition. So you're projecting delusion to reality.
quote:Or maybe both will gk back to baseline, or maybe any one of the possible outcomes in in combination. Of course, it's not surprise that you're arguing that there certain outcomes in the future, expecially one which we cannot control nor able to adequately assess to predict.
The kneeling/protests either stops entirely or continues to do grievous damage to the NFL's ratings.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News