- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: To all those calling for Etling to be benched
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:21 am to Merlin08
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:21 am to Merlin08
Some of those "Under Pressure" is being kind. He had guys all over him/ in his face/ or running for his life on some of those. Better protection would allow better QB play.
After Sat. if you think Etling doesn't have the chops to be a good QB, you've never been one.
After Sat. if you think Etling doesn't have the chops to be a good QB, you've never been one.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:42 am to AnotherRound
quote:In fairness he will become gun shy through a game and scramble when it's not needed. He had that tendency last year, and it showed up again Sat.
Some of those "Under Pressure" is being kind. He had guys all over him/ in his face/ or running for his life on some of those. Better protection would allow better QB play.
After Sat. if you think Etling doesn't have the chops to be a good QB, you've never been one.
I've "defended" DE. He is not shite. Nor is he a playmaker, he isn't going to make up for other deficient areas.
I am not for benching him for Narcisse/Brennen. If we had a playmaker, a better option even with a better performance record, I'd be for it. That option is there at this point in time. Plus, I'd hate to see a QB have to learn with these recievers. It's the ultimate frustration for a QB. It would be the opposite of developing chemistry. The season isn't lost enough to bench both Chark and Etling. To go ahead and develop a QB you might as well start with the WRs too.
However, someone above mentioned no turnovers. That is good. I will point out that no turnovers while still taking some risks and trying to make some plays. Which is different from the "no risk, no turnover" play of the past.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News