Started By
Message

re: Woman who chose baby instead of chemotherapy has died

Posted on 9/9/17 at 6:20 pm to
Posted by TypoKnig
Member since Aug 2011
8928 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

I admire her choice but in choosing that she chose to leave all her kids motherless. I know, go ahead and downvote.


With Glioblastoma, she would have died with or without chemotherapy. She decided to give the baby a chance.
Posted by cfa626
Member since Apr 2016
561 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 6:22 pm to
That's more understandable then.
Awful situation for everyone.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76821 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

With Glioblastoma, she would have died with or without chemotherapy. S

Well that basic info changes the story a good bit.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

With Glioblastoma, she would have died with or without chemotherapy.


Not always true but almost. Tough spot to be in regardless.
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10184 posts
Posted on 9/10/17 at 10:04 am to
A good friend's wife is dealing with glioblastoma now, probably won't live another 6 months, she is 35.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17542 posts
Posted on 9/10/17 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

With Glioblastoma, she would have died with or without chemotherapy. She decided to give the baby a chance.


GBMs are a "when" not an "if" situation. My experience is females do tend to last a tad longer than males. Actually know of 1 female pt that is still ticking 8 years post resection which is extremely rare.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram