- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amazon seeking second headquarters for 50K employees
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:55 am to NYCAuburn
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:55 am to NYCAuburn
quote:which is great
Most major catalog/online companies are located there. Amazon has one of their biggest facilities there already for distribution. They have been buying land in the area pretty heavily already recently.
but they're basically talking about a co-HQ. What does distribution have to do with it?
quote:so all those white collar jobs at HQ can send a bunch of UPS packages now?
Your comment about UPS is pretty naive considering the regions current businesses
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
quote:there is no way on this earth that Northern Kentucky has the size/quality of educated workers has Northern Virginia or even Dallas. Not a chance in hell
as does this region as well.
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 8:56 am
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:59 am to Pilot Tiger
quote:
but they're basically talking about a co-HQ. What does distribution have to do with it?
This is what I'm wondering. Seattle is hardly centrally located so I'm not sure it has anything to do with their business model.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:58 am to Pilot Tiger
quote:No, but if given the centralized location within Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana it's actually more ideal spot than one might think. For example, the combined land area of those 3 states is about 116,000 sq miles, the combined population is about 22.7 million, and the combined college enrollment (as of 2014) was about 1.26 million. That's roughly 196 people and 10.8 college students per square mile.
there is no way on this earth that Northern Kentucky has the size/quality of educated workers has Northern Virginia or even Dallas. Not a chance in hell
Texas, on the other hand, has a land area of about 261,000 sq miles with a population of about 27.9 million, and the college enrollment (2014) was about 1.44 million. That's roughly 107 people and 5.5 college students per square mile.
And beyond that, here is the drive time in hours from Cincinnati (in hours) to other major cities:
Chicago--4.5
Indianapolis--2
Columbus--1.75
Louisville--1.5
Cleveland--3.75
Nashville--4
Pittsburgh--4.5
Detroit--4
Compare that to DFW's drive time to major cities in its region:
Houston--3.5
San Antonio--4.25
OKC--3.25
Austin--3
So if attracting talent is a key, in many ways the area has some advantages over in terms of access to college students and other metro areas.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)