- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New phenomenon caused by climate change
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:42 am to bonhoeffer45
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:42 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
you realize how dumb you look trying to apply bandwagon fallacy to issues of overwhelming scientific consensus
no. quote:False equivalence. Classic thermo isn't comparable to the theory of AGW. But it was a nice attempt.
Would you call me referencing the first law of thermodynamics bandwagon nonsense as well?
quote:The attribution-with no evidence-of every single weather event to: "muh climate change" is... silly. Oversimplifed single-variable models of the climate system like you present are... silly. The more complex modeling is so full poorly constructed thermo, cooked boundary conditions, uncontrolled residuals, and strucural integrity that they are,,, sillly. The AGW acolyte community's tolerance for poor work (as long as it reaches the 'properr' conclusion) is...silly.
Though I guess the more interesting question is, what exactly do you object about the greenhouse effect? Scientifically speaking?
quote:I have no idea why you feel the need to make up stories in your head.
Or was that really just an attempt to make you feel like that overpriced online course taught you something?
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 8:48 am
1
Posted on 9/7/17 at 2:10 pm to Taxing Authority
For someone that wants to appear like he learned enough to lecture people about fallacious reasoning, anchoring half your response to a straw man makes you look kinda foolish TA.
Nowhere have I asserted every weather event is due to climate change, the argument from the consensus is that climate change affects the frequency, severity, and stability of climate phenomena, not that it magically is the reason for every rainfall. But the fact you are reaching for such preposterous straw men indicates either you 1.) have no better argument to offer, or 2.) really don't even grasp the basic science on this subject.
Now, back to my question, do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?
Nowhere have I asserted every weather event is due to climate change, the argument from the consensus is that climate change affects the frequency, severity, and stability of climate phenomena, not that it magically is the reason for every rainfall. But the fact you are reaching for such preposterous straw men indicates either you 1.) have no better argument to offer, or 2.) really don't even grasp the basic science on this subject.
Now, back to my question, do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News