- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New phenomenon caused by climate change
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:46 am to Taxing Authority
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:46 am to Taxing Authority
Next time you retake the course(third times the charm!) maybe you will make it to the point where you realize how dumb you look trying to apply bandwagon fallacy to issues of overwhelming scientific consensus. Is the next step in weak retorts gonna be an appeal to solipsism? That should be fun.
Would you call me referencing the first law of thermodynamics bandwagon nonsense as well?
Though I guess the more interesting question is, what exactly do you object about the greenhouse effect? Scientifically speaking? Or was that really just an attempt to make you feel like that overpriced online course taught you something?
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 1:53 am
1
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:42 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
you realize how dumb you look trying to apply bandwagon fallacy to issues of overwhelming scientific consensus
no. quote:False equivalence. Classic thermo isn't comparable to the theory of AGW. But it was a nice attempt.
Would you call me referencing the first law of thermodynamics bandwagon nonsense as well?
quote:The attribution-with no evidence-of every single weather event to: "muh climate change" is... silly. Oversimplifed single-variable models of the climate system like you present are... silly. The more complex modeling is so full poorly constructed thermo, cooked boundary conditions, uncontrolled residuals, and strucural integrity that they are,,, sillly. The AGW acolyte community's tolerance for poor work (as long as it reaches the 'properr' conclusion) is...silly.
Though I guess the more interesting question is, what exactly do you object about the greenhouse effect? Scientifically speaking?
quote:I have no idea why you feel the need to make up stories in your head.
Or was that really just an attempt to make you feel like that overpriced online course taught you something?
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 8:48 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News