Started By
Message

re: Coach O - The "Proof is in the Pudding" Assessment.

Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15962 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

No credit on recruiting? No kudos for keeping a class largely intact following a coaching change plus adding studs like Chaisson at the end?

Consider this article, written about Tom Herman and excusing his terrible recruiting haul. Here's the key quote:

"As is often the case, coaching changes are typically followed by reduced recruiting hauls - both in terms of quality and quantity - and Texas isn't any exception."

That's right, Tom Herman was not exceptional. You know who was? Coach O

O deserves kudos for keeping much of the class together, but that was one of his main selling points for getting the job in the first place, since he was already on staff.

Comparing our situation to any program that just went through a total regime change isn't exactly fair. If O was hired away as HC of a different program, he likely would encounter the same difficulty retaining recruits. Texas' 2018 class is already shaping up to be loaded, too.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69203 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Comparing our situation to any program that just went through a total regime change isn't exactly fair. If O was hired away as HC of a different program, he likely would encounter the same difficulty retaining recruits. Texas' 2018 class is already shaping up to be loaded, to


The defensive staff got rid of peveto and added Jenkins. That goes a long way in keeping players committed. The relationships with the staff stay in tact.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram