Started By
Message

re: What major US city (like top 50) would fare best?

Posted on 8/31/17 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20983 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Yeah I don't think people are grasping how much rain we are talking about


Theres a whole science behind who floods and when (hydrology). Its been a few years since I took it in college, but it comes down to 1)amount of rainfall coming down vs 2)local geography and ability to drain. Part of that is city infrastructure, but part of it is what surfaces are impervious to water, and how much flow can your outflow channels, rivers, creeks, etc can hold.

My point is that given NYC and to a lesser extent Chicagos high proportion of impervious surfaces coupled with proximity to large bodies of water that wont back up due to high water, and then youll have high immediate flooding that drains relatively quickly.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110076 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 12:27 pm to
I'm confident New York could handle a flood like this over Chicago, especially when you get outside of Manhattan.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60333 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 12:30 pm to
Here is an article discussing flooding in the Chicago area from 5-8 inches in a 24 hour period, 2-3 inches of rain per hour at the highest rate.

LINK

Houston received 15-25 inches in a 24 hr period (twice) and peak of 5-6 inches per hour.

I'm sure Chicago would handle it better than Houston, but there would still be large scale flooding and lots of damage
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram