- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What major US city (like top 50) would fare best?
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:29 am
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:29 am
In a major rain event such as Harvey: let's say 25 - 45 inches over 3 days covering a 50 mile radius around downtown...
I know that none would fare well, but some would fare better than others.
I know that none would fare well, but some would fare better than others.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:30 am to SwatMitchell
Umm, Vegas, Phoenix,
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:31 am to Hacker
Doesn't Phoenix flood from an average rain?
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:32 am to SwatMitchell
Denver ?
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 11:34 am
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:33 am to fightin tigers
Correct. Phoenix floods very easily.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:33 am to SwatMitchell
Non-coastal cities would be obliterated due to design year events being around 25-year.....I'd surmise Seattle would do better than the average bear simply due to dealing with consistent rain fall. You could put Miami in that conversation as well or even higher.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:34 am to CharlesLSU
I thought San Fran, but for some reason mudslides come to mind.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:35 am to Hacker
quote:
Vegas
Vegas has had to build these massive rain tunnels/sewage systems, because when they have a heavy rain event, it can immediately flood due to how dry the soil is and how rare it is.
If Vegas was hit by a Harvey I imagine it would be pretty bad.
Seems like a place like Denver would do ok.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:35 am to CharlesLSU
My first thought was Miami or Tampa
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:36 am to SwatMitchell
Assuming just rain and no storm surge?
A city actually on the coast should handle it best since water doesnr have to drain far.
So maybe Miami
A city actually on the coast should handle it best since water doesnr have to drain far.
So maybe Miami
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:36 am to 12Pence
quote:
Denver
Does/would Denver drain well? It seems like there could be some big issue with mountain runoff
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:36 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Seems like a place like Denver would do ok.
Trust me It will flood here too with 4" of rain
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:37 am to Fun Bunch
2013 Colorado Floods
...now imagine what 50" would do....
quote:
The situation intensified on September 11 and 12. Boulder County was worst hit, with 9.08 inches (231 mm) recorded September 12 and up to 17 inches (430 mm) of rain recorded
...now imagine what 50" would do....
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:37 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
surmise Seattle would do better than the average bear simply due to dealing with consistent rain fall.
but they average >10 inches less a year than Houston does and 13 inches less than Harvey dropped in spots in Houston and Beaumont.
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am to SwatMitchell
quote:
What major US city (like top 50) would fare best?
I'm guessing Seattle and San Francisco that drain directly out into the ocean.
I'm sure they both still have low points that would flood, but I bet it would be less impactful than in Houston.
I think Vegas would be the most fricked, since they have mountains on all sides, they are pretty much in a valley bowl... it would take a LONG time for all of that to flow into Lake Mead.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am to SwatMitchell
It's hard to say based on that, because that type of rain is even more abnormal in some areas than others.
Atlanta hit over 500 year flood levels in 2009 with 10-15 inches of rain.
Atlanta hit over 500 year flood levels in 2009 with 10-15 inches of rain.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am to SwatMitchell
I am going San Francisco. Sure there are parts that are going to get 20 feet deep, but there is a lot of elevation.
Places like the Marina district and probably Mission are going to get wasted, but Presido, Castro, Nob Hill, Pacific Heights should be fine. Most water is going to drain away from center.
This is all assuming this did not come with storm surge.
Places like the Marina district and probably Mission are going to get wasted, but Presido, Castro, Nob Hill, Pacific Heights should be fine. Most water is going to drain away from center.
This is all assuming this did not come with storm surge.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:39 am to Dire Wolf
Its the closest large metro area I can think of that experiences higher than typical precip....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News