Started By
Message

re: Protester kicks tear gas back at cops who then shoot him in the balls with a riot weapon

Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35703 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Wrong. Again, I generally only post here when I see something so ridiculously ignorant that I can't help but shoving the stupidity back in their face.



quote:

So a policeman firing a teargas canister at a protestor that kicked one back is one of those ridiculously ignorant times?



And where is your proof of how ridiculous it is of us to think it was justified?


The Constitution?

A country supposedly founded on freedom and liberty?

The 1960s protests where police eventually shot real bullets and the response was the same as in this thread?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43480 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

The Constitution?


Please tell me which Article and Section in the US Constitution specifically deals with the video situation.

And then after you do that, please tell me how the police officers should have handled things differently to remain within their Constitutional limits.

I'll be waiting.

Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

The 1960s protests where police eventually shot real bullets and the response was the same as in this thread?

Now you speak of what you know absolutely nothing and of which the two protested subjects have absolutely nothing in common.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58409 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

The Constitution?



The constitution doesn't give anyone the right to an unpeaceful protest.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram