Bought my Panny plasma in 2008. Had it calibrated by a real ISF professional within the service menu. Today, you could not believe how close to perfect it still is. Deep shadow detail, no noise in shadows, rich, accurate colors without looking cartoonish, whites that look white not blueish.

By today's standards, it is a behemoth. Large bezel, thick and it produces considerable heat. But where it counts, picture quality, today, only an OLED could beat it.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by GEAUXT

Member since Nov 2007

29285 posts

Posted on 8/21/17 at 9:18 am to HubbaBubba

quote:
Bought my Panny plasma in 2008. Had it calibrated by a real ISF professional within the service menu. Today, you could not believe how close to perfect it still is. Deep shadow detail, no noise in shadows, rich, accurate colors without looking cartoonish, whites that look white not blueish.

By today's standards, it is a behemoth. Large bezel, thick and it produces considerable heat. But where it counts, picture quality, today, only an OLED could beat it.

Yep, mine looks so antiquated. It'S a 47" thats the size of like a 60". However, I have yet to find something that matches the picture quality. Also, that 600hz refresh rate is

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BadMrK

Addis, La

Member since Dec 2016

143 posts

Posted on 8/21/17 at 11:49 am to HubbaBubba

I snagged one of their last gen plasma's, an ST60, right before they quit making them. It was widely considered the best bang for your buck TV that was available as its PQ rivaled some of the flagship TV's at the time . It's PQ is nearly perfect. By this time (either 2012 or 2013 iirc) the tech had gotten much smaller, this TV is really thin especially for a plasma. I was shocked when I pulled it out of the box. I love it, my only regret is that I bought it in 50", I should have gone 60"

1 ...

Report Post

Tech Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board