- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Anybody remember when RUssia hacked the election?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:50 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:50 pm
quote:Hawkeye007 LINK
The Russian's hacked the election when they thought Donald was going to loose.
quote:DisplacedCuckeye LINK
There's no question of a Russian hacking campaign against our election.
quote:LSUTANGERINE LINK
hey have already confirmed that Russia hacked into the election process
quote:a want LINK
How bout the tradition of fake news claiming the Russians hacked the election without any evidence? Jesse Christ. I'll grant Trump one thing. He has succeeded in convincing his followers black is white and white is black. You guys are so misinformed it's pitiful.
quote:cruiserhog LINK
because every intelligence gathering agency of the US knows that Russia interfered in the outcome of the most sacred part of our democracy, the transfer of power.
quote:the spleen LINK
I guess it depends on how you want to define "hacking the election." Here's a pretty good article, with named sources, on the "hacking."
quote:celticdog LINK
Russians hacked everyone. They picked the winner bannon wanted.
this is a good start.
The further we go back the more lefties, "moderates", "libertarians", and other cucks were all saying the same thing. This was a good start for the progs. Maybe next I'll do the "libertarians"
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:55 pm to CptBengal
quote:
The further we go back the more lefties, "moderates", "libertarians", and other cucks were all saying the same thing. This was a good start for the progs. Maybe next I'll do the "libertarians"
Go back further. It wasn't insinuated UNTIL HILLARY LOST ON ELECTION NIGHT!
That's the thing we are all missing.
Why wasn't this brought up weeks, months, or a year before the election?
Didn't the gay Muslim president say that it was foolish to think Russia tampered with our election?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:57 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Go back further. It wasn't insinuated UNTIL HILLARY LOST ON ELECTION NIGHT!
Oh...Im only to March 15th.
next I'll probably go back to the 1st of the year.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:59 pm to CptBengal
Same exact bunch of prevaricators now don't say boo about muh Russians and collusion but wail about 'lies', 'obstruction', and 'money'.
Craven, really...
Craven, really...
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:01 pm to CptBengal
I remember when there was some article about hacking the election machines, based on some believed abnormality, and the NYT, 538, etc. shot that hacking story down immediately.
Now, hacking into the campaigns, as some of those posts referenced, seems much more reasonable than actually hacking the election itself.
Now, hacking into the campaigns, as some of those posts referenced, seems much more reasonable than actually hacking the election itself.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:02 pm to CptBengal
quote:
The further we go back the more lefties, "moderates", "libertarians", and other cucks were all saying the same thing. This was a good start for the progs. Maybe next I'll do the "libertarians"
I sense your fear brother.
It's okay...Trump will be fine...we both know he wasn't smart enough to collude with the Ruskies...
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:05 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Now, hacking into the campaigns,
what does this even mean?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:12 pm to CptBengal
It means the goal posts have moved and they are still making up shite.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:14 pm to CptBengal
quote:
what does this even mean?
quote:It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak. They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.
what does this even mean?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:16 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak. They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.
why?
seriously. do you have any information on that?
oh, and that isnt hacking a campaign, that is hacking a citizen...and we know Podesta wasnt hacked. He was phished.
let's see you try again.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:18 pm to CptBengal
quote:
this is a good start.
Dude, that's a tough list you made...all I see is a lot of
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:24 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak.
Wasn't it also determined that our IC had the ability to disguise their IP to make it appear that Russians were doing the hacking?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:26 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
It means I find it reasonable to conclude that Russia may have been behind the Podesta emails hack and/or leak. They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.
Russia may be a reasonable suspect, but the most reasonable suspect would be someone with direct access to the information, like most whistleblowers.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:30 pm to CptBengal
quote:No, but we know Russia is one of the major hacking countries, that's why I said:
why?
seriously. do you have any information on that?
quote:I'm just saying that it's reasonable to believe, not that it's 100% fact by any means. Arguing one way or the other as certainty would not be reasonable though.
They seem like one of the reasonable suspects at least.
quote:Well all campaign members are private citizens, but he was the Chairman of her Campaign when it occurred.
oh, and that isnt hacking a campaign,
quote:Again. You're making some distinction when you know very well it's a minor technical distinction that most don't know about. Like anti-virus software is actually anti-malware for the most part since virus is only a type of malware. Besides phishing is often used as hacking:
and we know Podesta wasnt hacked. He was phished.
HACKER LEXICON: WHAT IS PHISHING?
quote:
An estimated 91-percent of hacking attacks begin with a phishing or spear-phishing email.
quote:I presented why I thought it was a REASONABLE argument, and you ignored that, and instead decided to play word games.
let's see you try again.
I don't know why you would have a problem with someone saying it's reasonable to suspect Russia may have been involved in these activities, although it's not reasonable to think they actually hacked the election itself.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:31 pm to CptBengal
I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. I'm sure it's nothing.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:32 pm to chickenpotpie
quote:They may be true for the DNC leaks, but that doesn't make sense for the Podesta leaks given how the information was accessed.
Russia may be a reasonable suspect, but the most reasonable suspect would be someone with direct access to the information, like most whistleblowers.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:33 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
seriously. do you have any information on that?
No, but we know Russia is one of the major hacking countries, that's why I said:
literally EVERYONE is hacking. seriously?
quote:
I'm just saying that it's reasonable to believe, not that it's 100% fact by any means. Arguing one way or the other as certainty would not be reasonable though.
it would be even more reasonable to assume CHina then.
quote:
Well all campaign members are private citizens, but he was the Chairman of her Campaign when it occurred.
but they didnt hack him, they phished him.
quote:
I presented why I thought it was a REASONABLE argument,
based on your definition of reasonable....the US government is just as likely.
Fail again.
Let's see you try a third time!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News