- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:25 am to Eurocat
quote:
Thank you Shorty.
Frankly, I prefer the original pre-17th setup.
To be sure, your points regarding the fact that party could easily lock out guys like Cruz and Paul are possibly true.
Then again, it's not a given. The reason is simple.
You're doing the thing I point out that's wrong A LOT when people evaluate change. You're looking at repealing the 17th as "tomorrow looks just like today, only no 17th".
The reality is, the people of Kentucky voted in Paul. Hence, they like Paul.
TODAY, their vote for governor or state reps really has no bearing on the Senate so, it is a complete non issue in state elections.
It would be pretty naïve to assume that if the states chose their senators, WHOM they chose would remain a non-issue in state level elections.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)