Started By
Message

re: Wedding photographer wins $1 million defamation suit against Texas couple

Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
120000 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:18 pm to
It appears they signed a contract stating the purchase of items, but didn't want to and used social media to call her a scammer.


Idiots.



A Dallas County jury deliberated for two hours Monday and saw evidence in court that "affirmed that Ms. Polito followed the terms of the contract signed by the couple and even sought to further explain the contract and satisfy their demands," the release said.

The Moldovans were found liable for disparagement, defamation, and civil conspiracy. They must now pay Polito $1.08 million in damages.
This post was edited on 8/1/17 at 3:20 pm
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13958 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

The Moldovans were found liable for disparagement, defamation, and civil conspiracy. They must now pay Polito $1.08 million in damages. This post was edited on 8/1 at 3:20 pm

I am a little embarrassed I don't know this, but how do verdicts like this actually work out? I didn't even click the link, but let's assume this couple is 30 years old. Let's say they bring in together $120k/yr and they have a total combined networth of $100k currently.

How do they pay $1.08 million? Are all assets seized? Are they put on a payment plan? Who decides the terms of the payment plan?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram