Started By
Message

re: Chemical Safety Board releases animation of fire at 2016 BR Exxon refinery

Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:52 pm to
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82094 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Not really disagreeing with you there as I don't know too much about valves, but if you have only 3% of your valves with a different configuration, you better damn well identify it as such and do so in a very conspicuous way. Especially if your "accepted procedure" is obviously geared toward the 97%. You can't have a universal procedure when your equipment isn't the same. That valve needed to be tagged or identified as different from the rest.
there's all kinds of valves. They're not all the same. We stress this all the time; when you're working and conditions/work plan changes you need to step back and do a hazard assessment. The valve wasn't the issue
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
135142 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The valve wasn't the issue

I never said it was. Goddamn, can y'all not read?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram